Literature DB >> 6692270

Mass screening for control of breast cancer.

P Strax.   

Abstract

The serious import of breast cancer lies in its potential for metastatic spread, which probably starts early in the course of the disease. Detection of the lesion when immunocompetence can control the metastases leads to long-term survival. This usually involves detection of unsuspected, preclinical disease. This is the important lesson learned from the large screening program of the Health Insurance Plan of New York, where they used palpation and mammography. The substantial reduction in mortality over a matched control group has continued in a 15-year follow-up. Improved mammography techniques at the Guttman Institute, a mass screening project in New York, New York, conducted in cooperation with the American Cancer Society and in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project, which used the Guttman Institute program as a prototype, have led to substantially improved yield from mammography in screening. Three important factors in mass screening are discussed: (1) benefits versus hazards in mammography, (2) correct age to start screening, and (3) costs of screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6692270     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3+<665::aid-cncr2820531312>3.0.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  10 in total

1.  Screening for breast cancer: current status, problems, prospects.

Authors:  J E Devitt
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Breast Examination: What's Reasonable?

Authors:  D S Esdaile
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Screening for breast cancer: current attitudes and practice.

Authors:  E J Noulty
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Current evaluation of the contribution of self-examination to secondary prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  V F Semiglazov; V M Moiseyenko
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 5.  Review of general surgery 1984-85.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Breast self-examination: improving competence and frequency in a classroom setting.

Authors:  R H Dorsay; W D Cuneo; C P Somkin; I S Tekawa
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  C J Baines
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  A comparison of breast cancers detected by mass screening and those found in out-patient clinics.

Authors:  M Noguchi; M Earashi; N Ohta; H Kitagawa; M Thomas; I Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Breast cancer beliefs of women participating in a television-promoted mammography screening project.

Authors:  S M Fuller; R J McDermott; R G Roetzheim; P J Marty
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 10.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.