Literature DB >> 6692261

Osseous metastases of breast cancer. Clinical, biochemical, radiographic, and scintigraphic evaluation of response to therapy.

G N Hortobagyi, H I Libshitz, J E Seabold.   

Abstract

Serial bone scans and radiographs were assessed in 50 patients with breast cancer metastatic to bone treated with combination chemotherapy. In 34 patients evaluable nonosseous metastases were present in addition to bone lesions. Clinical and biochemical changes also were assessed serially, independent of skeletal disease. Pretherapy bone scans were more sensitive but less specific than radiographs for detection of osseous metastasis. Response to therapy in nonosseous metastasis correlated well with radiographic improvement of bone lesions (91%), but less well with changes in bone scans (57%). There was concordance between clinical and radiographic findings, suggesting progression of metastatic disease, in 81% of patients and between scan and clinical findings in 72% of them. Changes in carcinoembryonic antigen levels closely reflected clinical and radiographic changes. Serial bone radiographs are the most useful method of determining response to therapy in breast cancer metastatic to bone. The addition of scintigraphs and carcinoembryonic antigen measurements results in a highly sensitive and accurate method of response evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6692261     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3<577::aid-cncr2820530335>3.0.co;2-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  14 in total

1.  Radiosurgery for metastatic spinal tumors: follow-up MR findings.

Authors:  Y J Hwang; M-J Sohn; B H Lee; S Y Kim; J W Seo; Y H Han; J Y Lee; S J Cha; Y H Kim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Dual-energy CT-scan quantification of recalcification in osteolyses of the vertebral body due to mammary carcinomas in the course of antineoplastic treatment.

Authors:  W Crone-Münzebrock; U M Carl
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  The value of thallium and three-phase bone scans in the evaluation of bone and soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  C I Caluser; H M Abdel-Dayem; H A Macapinlac; A Scott; J H Healey; A Huvos; H Kalaigian; S D Yeh; S M Larson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-11

4.  The flare phenomenon: far from fair and square.

Authors:  W D van Schelven; E K Pauwels
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-05

5.  Osteodensitometry of vertebral metastases after radiotherapy using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  W D Reinbold; M Wannenmacher; N Hodapp; C P Adler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Advanced breast cancer treatment with folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin C.

Authors:  G Francini; R Petrioli; A Aquino; S Gonnelli
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Tests for detecting recurrent disease in the follow-up of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Mansi; H M Earl; T J Powles; R C Coombes
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Prospective assessment of the role of five tumour markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  J F Robertson; D Pearson; M R Price; C Selby; J Pearson; R W Blamey; A Howell
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 9.  Imaging response to systemic therapy for bone metastases.

Authors:  Tobias Bäuerle; Wolfhard Semmler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  The role of bisphosphonates in the treatment of bone metastases--the U.S. experience.

Authors:  H A Harvey; A Lipton
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.