Literature DB >> 6688382

Influence of scheduling on therapeutic and toxic effect of AMSA in Lewis lung carcinoma.

C Greco, G Zupi, G Badaracco.   

Abstract

The antitumor activity and toxic effect of AMSA were studied in Lewis lung carcinoma (3LL) at various stages of growth. The total dose of drug injected IP was 15 mg/kg, which is equivalent to the LD10. Different administration schedules were tested, these being single-injection schedules (day 1, 7, or 10 after tumor implantation) and repeated low-dose-injection regimens (days 1, 4, and 7 and days 1-7 after tumor implantation). Tumor weight inhibition, retardation of growth, reduction in the number of metastases, and median survival time of treated mice over controls were analyzed as end-points to evaluate the antitumor activity of AMSA. Early deaths and changes in white blood cell count were considered as parameters of toxicity. Our findings can be summarized as follows: (1) AMSA is only minimally effective against primary 3LL tumor at all the growth stages examined and no schedule-dependency is detected; (2) a greater reduction in metastases (70%-77%) is found when the drug is administered fractionally than when it is given in a single dose (39%-60%); (3) irreversible leukopenia is induced by the single-dose schedule of AMSA administration while after repeated low doses the white blood cell counts are in the same range of those of the control groups. Therefore, because of the schedule-dependency of toxicity and reduction in metastases, fractionated administration of AMSA at this dose level would be suitable for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6688382     DOI: 10.1007/bf00257415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  16 in total

1.  Phase 1 clinical investigation of 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide (NSC 249992), a new acridine derivative.

Authors:  S S Legha; J U Gutterman; S W Hall; R S Benjamin; M A Burgess; M Valdivieso; G P Bodey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  The new NCI screen and its implications for clinical evaluation.

Authors:  A Goldin; J M Venditti
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1980

3.  Distribution and antitumor activity of adriamycin given in a high-dose and a repeated low-dose schedule to mice.

Authors:  M A Pacciarini; B Barbieri; T Colombo; M Broggini; S Garattini; M G Donelli
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1978-05

4.  Comparative antineoplastic activity of adriamycin and N-trifluoroacetyladriamycin-14-valerate.

Authors:  A Vecchi; M Cairo; A Mantovani; M Sironi; F Spreafico
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1978-01

5.  The experimental antitumour properties of three congeners of the acridylmethanesulphonanilide (AMSA) series.

Authors:  B F Cain; G J Atwell
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 6.  m-AMSA and PALA: two new agents in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Rozencweig; D D Von Hoff; R L Cysyk; F M Muggia
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Phase II study of AMSA in lung cancer.

Authors:  M K Samson; R J Fraile; L H Baker; G Cummings; R W Talley
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug

8.  Preclinical toxicologic evaluation of 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide (AMSA) in mice, dogs, and monkeys.

Authors:  M C Henry; C D Port; B S Levine
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1980 Aug-Sep

9.  A comparison of adriamycin and mAMSA in vitro: cell lethality and SCE studies.

Authors:  C West; I J Stratford; N Barrass; E Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Cyclophosphamide and iphosphamide against Lewis lung carcinoma: evaluation of toxic and therapeutic effects.

Authors:  C Greco; A Corsi; M Caputo; A Cavallari; F Calabresi
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1979-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.