Literature DB >> 6681866

Comparison of transformation efficiency of human active and inactive X-chromosomal DNA.

L Venolia, S M Gartler.   

Abstract

The mechanism of X-chromosome inactivation has been investigated recently using DNA-mediated transformation of the X-linked hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase (hprt) locus. Several experiments indicate that inactive X-chromosomal DNA does not function in HPRT transformation. Liskay and Evans used DNA from hamster or mouse cells which had an hprt- allele on the active X chromosome and an hprt+ allele on the inactive X chromosome. We and others used rodent-human hybrid cell lines which had an hprt+ allele on the inactive human X chromosome alone. DNA from all of these cells failed to transform HPRT- recipients. Recently, Chapman et al. have shown that inactive X-chromosome DNA from several tissues of adult female mice is strikingly inefficient in genetic transformation for the hprt gene. On the other hand, de Jonge et al., using simian virus 40 (SV40)-transformed fibroblasts from a human heterozygous for an HPRT deficiency, observed HPRT transformation regardless of whether the hprt+ allele was on the active or the inactive X chromosome of the donor cells. We have done an experiment similar to that of deJonge et al., and report here results which clearly indicate that DNA from the inactive X chromosome functions very poorly in HPRT transformation, thus supporting the original interpretation of Liskay and Evans that inactive X-chromosomal DNA is structurally modified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6681866     DOI: 10.1038/302082a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  23 in total

Review 1.  Gracefully ageing at 50, X-chromosome inactivation becomes a paradigm for RNA and chromatin control.

Authors:  Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  X-chromosome inactivation and escape.

Authors:  Christine M Disteche; Joel B Berletch
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Methylation status of CpG-rich islands on active and inactive mouse X chromosomes.

Authors:  D P Norris; N Brockdorff; S Rastan
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Modulation of tk expression in mouse pericentromeric heterochromatin.

Authors:  K Butner; C W Lo
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  Linking the Epigenome with Exposure Effects and Susceptibility: The Epigenetic Seed and Soil Model.

Authors:  Emma C Bowers; Shaun D McCullough
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Analysis of inactive X chromosome structure by in situ nick translation.

Authors:  K A Dyer; D Riley; S M Gartler
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Complementation and genetic inactivation: two alternative mechanisms leading to prototrophy in diploid bacterial clones.

Authors:  C Lévi-Meyrueis; C Sanchez-Rivas
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1984

8.  Cytogenetic and molecular studies on a recombinant human X chromosome: implications for the spreading of X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  T Mohandas; R L Geller; P H Yen; J Rosendorff; R Bernstein; A Yoshida; L J Shapiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Epigenetic regulation of the intestinal epithelium.

Authors:  Ellen N Elliott; Klaus H Kaestner
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  The maintenance of methylation-free islands in transgenic mice.

Authors:  A B Kolsto; G Kollias; V Giguere; K I Isobe; H Prydz; F Grosveld
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-12-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.