Literature DB >> 6679577

Comparison of mechanical work and metabolic energy consumption during normal gait.

R G Burdett, G S Skrinar, S R Simon.   

Abstract

The validity of using mechanical measures of work to indicate the metabolic energy consumption during normal gait was examined. These mechanical measures were (a) mechanical work done on the center of mass per kilogram body mass per second (Wcm), calculated by integration of ground reaction forces measured by force platforms; (b) total body segmental work per kilogram body mass per second (Wseg), calculated from individual body segment energies measured by motion analysis; and (c) the sum of the normalized absolute moment impulses per second acting on the joints of the lower extremities (M), calculated from both force and motion data. The metabolic energy consumption, determined by analysis of expired air, and the three mechanical measures of work were calculated for six normal subjects walking at five speeds. Each measure of mechanical work per second walked was highly correlated with metabolic energy consumption/kg X s (r = 0.89 for Wcm, r = 0.79 for Wseg, and r = 0.85 for M), but a poorer correlation was found between each measure of mechanical work per meter walked and net metabolic energy consumption/kg X m (r = 0.54 for Wcm, r = 0.28 for Wseg, and r = 0.03 for M). These mechanical parameters, particularly when measured per time, may be useful in comparing metabolic energy consumption between individuals or between different walking conditions for the same individual.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6679577     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100010109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  15 in total

1.  The relationships between muscle, external, internal and joint mechanical work during normal walking.

Authors:  Kotaro Sasaki; Richard R Neptune; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Transfemoral amputations: is there an effect of residual limb length and orientation on energy expenditure?

Authors:  Johanna C Bell; Erik J Wolf; Barri L Schnall; John E Tis; Benjamin K Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Obesity does not impair walking economy across a range of speeds and grades.

Authors:  Raymond C Browning; Michelle M Reynolds; Wayne J Board; Kellie A Walters; Raoul F Reiser
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2013-02-14

4.  Do patients with bone bridge amputations have improved gait compared with patients with traditional amputations?

Authors:  Trevor Kingsbury; Nancy Thesing; John David Collins; Joseph Carney; Marilynn Wyatt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The influence of foot position on body dynamics.

Authors:  Maria K Lebiedowska; Todd M Wente; Michelle Dufour
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Taking advantage of external mechanical work to reduce metabolic cost: the mechanics and energetics of split-belt treadmill walking.

Authors:  Natalia Sánchez; Surabhi N Simha; J Maxwell Donelan; James M Finley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Effects of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis on Amputee Hip Compensations: A Case Series.

Authors:  Toby Elery; Siavash Rezazadeh; Emma Reznick; Leslie Gray; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Instantaneous Metabolic Cost of Walking: Joint-Space Dynamic Model with Subject-Specific Heat Rate.

Authors:  Dustyn Roberts; Howard Hillstrom; Joo H Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mechanical lifting energy consumption in work activities designed by means of the "revised NIOSH lifting equation".

Authors:  Alberto Ranavolo; Tiwana Varrecchia; Martina Rinaldi; Alessio Silvetti; Mariano Serrao; Silvia Conforto; Francesco Draicchio
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.179

10.  Correlating mechanical work with energy consumption during gait throughout pregnancy.

Authors:  Zarko Krkeljas; Sarah Johanna Moss
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.