Literature DB >> 6669030

The auditory recency advantage in longer term free recall is not enhanced by recalling prerecency items first.

J M Gardiner, M M Gardiner, V H Gregg.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6669030     DOI: 10.3758/bf03198286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  On recency and echoic memory.

Authors:  J M Gardiner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1983-08-11       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Further evidence of interference between lipreading and auditory recency.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; S E Gathercole; V H Gregg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The modality effect and echoic persistence.

Authors:  O C Watkins; M J Watkins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-09

4.  Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of American Sign Language.

Authors:  M A Shand; E S Klima
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1981-11

5.  Hearing by eye.

Authors:  R Campbell; B Dodd
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Spatial and temporal processing in the auditory and visual modalities.

Authors:  J Metcalfe; D Glavanov; M Murdock
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1981-07

7.  The stimulus suffix effect as a memory coding phenomenon.

Authors:  K T Spoehr; W J Corin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1978-11
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Presentation format and its effect on working memory.

Authors:  Paula Goolkasian; Paul W Foos
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

2.  Presentation format effects in working memory: the role of attention.

Authors:  Paul W Foos; Paula Goolkasian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.