Literature DB >> 6667201

Evoked responses to distinct and nebulous stereoscopic stimuli.

D B Dunlop, P Dunlop, B Fenelon, R A Neill.   

Abstract

When geometric or contoured shapes are generated as disparity regions in dynamic random-dot stereograms, the question of whether the subject's response is evoked largely by boundaries and corners of the disparate region arises. To examine this question a disparate square was shifted randomly within a focal region at one millisecond intervals, resulting in a nebulous stimulus which "welled up" in the centre of the field of view. The technique may be regarded as an analogue of the defocusing technique used to resolve similar questions about evoked potentials to patterned stimuli. Average visual evoked potentials (VEP) were recorded from homolateral pairs of occipital and posterior temporal electrodes referred to a common midline prefrontal site. The latencies and amplitudes of VEP to distinct and nebulous stimuli were compared in a group of young normal adults, of whom 14 succeeded in perceiving and 14 failed to perceive the presented stimuli. Latencies of maximal response to distinct and nebulous stimuli were closely similar in the two groups (range N242-N252). Mean amplitudes of the peak response differed between perceivers and non-perceivers. The responses to nebulous stimuli were smaller than those to distinct stimuli in site-for-site comparisons in both groups. Even in short averaging runs a substantial VEP (about 3 microvolt) was recorded to nebulous stimuli in the perceiver group. It is suggested that both disparity and boundary features contribute to the VEP when this particular display system is used.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6667201     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1983.tb01096.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0310-1177


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of depth perception using psychophysical thresholds and stereoscopically evoked brain activity.

Authors:  Wolfgang Skrandies
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Evoked potentials to dynamic random dot stimuli with varying dot density ratios of disparity to background.

Authors:  R A Neill; B Fenelon; M L Manning; B G Frost
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-11-15       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Evoked potentials to dynamic random dot stereograms in upper, center and lower fields.

Authors:  B Fenelon; R A Neill; C T White
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-07-15       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Stereoscopic evoked responses to crossed and uncrossed disparity accompanying simulated refractive error.

Authors:  R A Neill; P Dunlop; D B Dunlop; B Fenelon; C Dunlop
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Stereoscopic visual evoked potentials in normal subjects and patients with open-angle glaucomas.

Authors:  Antonio Bergua; Folkert K Horn; Peter Martus; Anselm M Jünemann; Matthias Korth
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 3.117

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.