Literature DB >> 3743335

Evoked potentials to dynamic random dot stereograms in upper, center and lower fields.

B Fenelon, R A Neill, C T White.   

Abstract

Dynamic random dot stereograms consisting of square, crossed disparities subtending 3 degrees, exposure duration 100 ms, were presented in the midplane centrally (surrounding the fixation point) and in the upper and lower fields at 3.5 degrees vertical displacement from fixation. Stereoscopic cerebral evoked potentials (EPs) recorded from scalp sites 02, 01, T6 and T5 (10-20 system) were analyzed in a group of normal young adults (N = 28). Fourteen were able to perceive and report the stereophenomenon (perceivers); the other half were unable to do so (nonperceivers). Mean response amplitudes were significantly larger to center field stimuli than to those in the upper field. Responses were larger in perceivers than nonperceivers, maximal at T5, and larger to stimuli with definite than indefinite boundaries. Peak EP latencies were shortest to lower field stimuli (243 ms) but not significantly different than to center (247 ms) or upper (253 ms) field stimuli. A separate experiment comparing EP amplitudes and latencies with crossed and uncrossed disparities of varying magnitudes confirmed greater responses to the crossed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3743335     DOI: 10.1007/bf00157125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  7 in total

1.  Dynamic random-dot stereograms reveal up-down anisotropy and left-right isotropy between cortical hemifields.

Authors:  B Breitmeyer; B Julesz; W Kropfl
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-01-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Differences between the occipital distribution of upper and lower field pattern-evoked responses in man.

Authors:  W F Michael; A M Halliday
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-09-24       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Changes in pattern-evoked responses in man associated with the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W F Michael
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Evoked responses to distinct and nebulous stereoscopic stimuli.

Authors:  D B Dunlop; P Dunlop; B Fenelon; R A Neill
Journal:  Aust J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-11

5.  Stereoscopic cerebral evoked potentials of Air Force pilots and civilian comparison groups.

Authors:  B Fenelon; R A Neill; M Manning
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1984-10

6.  Lateralized cortical potentials evoked in humans by dynamic random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  D Lehmann; B Julesz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Human cerebral potentials evoked by moving dynamic random dot stereograms.

Authors:  M J Herpers; H B Caberg; J M Mol
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-07
  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Depth-related visually evoked potentials by dynamic random-dot stereograms in humans: negative correlation between the peaks elicited by convergent and divergent disparities.

Authors:  Babür Sahinoğlu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-12-24       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Difficulties in the definition of 'stereoscotoma' using temporal detection of thresholds of dynamic random dot stereograms.

Authors:  D C Finlay; M L Manning; D P Dunlop; S A Dewis
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Evoked potentials to dynamic random dot stimuli with varying dot density ratios of disparity to background.

Authors:  R A Neill; B Fenelon; M L Manning; B G Frost
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-11-15       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Stereoscopic evoked responses to crossed and uncrossed disparity accompanying simulated refractive error.

Authors:  R A Neill; P Dunlop; D B Dunlop; B Fenelon; C Dunlop
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.638

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.