Literature DB >> 6661854

Tumour cellularity, oestrogen receptors and prognosis in breast cancer.

R Black, R Prescott, K Bers, A Hawkins, H Stewart, P Forrest.   

Abstract

One hundred and thirty-seven patients with operable breast cancer have been treated by mastectomy and node sampling. At the time of operation, portions of tumour were taken for determination of oestrogen receptor activity. In 91 cases adjacent tissue was taken for fixation and histological assessment of malignant epithelial cell content ('cellularity index'). The patients were followed for two years or more, or until first recurrence or death. Prognosis (probability of staying disease-free) was significantly better in patients whose tumours contained receptors than in those whose tumours were receptor-negative (p less than 0.03). However, the best prognosis was in patients with low receptor positive tumours. Those with highest values had a prognosis almost as poor as patients with receptor-negative tumours. In addition, a new finding emerged: prognosis was better in patients with tumours of low cellularity than in those with tumours of high cellularity (p less than 0.04). Since, for receptor-positive tumours, receptor level was also significantly correlated with cellularity (R = +0.35, p less than 0.01), the relationship between prognosis and receptor level was re-examined after 'correction' of the latter quantity for differences in cellularity: on this basis, again prognosis was better in patients with receptor-positive tumours (p less than 0.02), but there was no longer a tendency for any one sub-group of patients with receptor-positive tumours to fare better than the rest. It is concluded that prognosis in operable breast cancer is related to oestrogen receptor activity (either per mg weight, or per cell) and to cellularity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6661854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0305-7399


  11 in total

1.  Estrogen receptor quantitative measures and breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Deirdre A Hill; Marc Barry; Charles Wiggins; Andrea Nibbe; Melanie Royce; Eric Prossnitz; Lesley Lomo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  S Y Choi; Y-W Chang; H J Park; H J Kim; S S Hong; D Y Seo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer: prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake values and apparent diffusion coefficient values of the primary lesion.

Authors:  Masatoyo Nakajo; Yoriko Kajiya; Tomoyo Kaneko; Youichi Kaneko; Takashi Takasaki; Atsushi Tani; Masako Ueno; Chihaya Koriyama; Masayuki Nakajo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Morphometric analysis of breast carcinoma: association with survival.

Authors:  D M Parham; A J Robertson; R A Brown
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Methylsulfonylmethane suppresses breast cancer growth by down-regulating STAT3 and STAT5b pathways.

Authors:  Eun Joung Lim; Dae Young Hong; Jin Hee Park; Youn Hee Joung; Pramod Darvin; Sang Yoon Kim; Yoon Mi Na; Tae Sook Hwang; Sang-Kyu Ye; Eon-Soo Moon; Byung Wook Cho; Kyung Do Park; Hak Kyo Lee; Taekyu Park; Young Mok Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Perfusion Parameters as Imaging Biomarkers of Angiogenesis.

Authors:  Sung Hun Kim; Hyeon Sil Lee; Bong Joo Kang; Byung Joo Song; Hyun-Bin Kim; Hyunyong Lee; Min-Sun Jin; Ahwon Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Breast Cancer: Correlation of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value with Pathologic Prognostic Factors.

Authors:  Şehnaz Tezcan; Nihal Uslu; Funda Ulu Öztürk; Eda Yılmaz Akçay; Tugan Tezcaner
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-10-01

8.  Diffusion-weighted imaging and FDG PET/CT: predicting the prognoses with apparent diffusion coefficient values and maximum standardized uptake values in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  Bo Bae Choi; Sung Hun Kim; Bong Joo Kang; Ji Hye Lee; Byung Joo Song; Seung Hee Jeong; Hyeon Woo Yim
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Additional Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Evaluate Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer: Correlation with the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Park; Kyu Ran Cho; Bo Kyoung Seo; Ok Hee Woo; Sung Bum Cho; Jeoung Won Bae
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 0.212

10.  PFOS induces proliferation, cell-cycle progression, and malignant phenotype in human breast epithelial cells.

Authors:  Paula Pierozan; Oskar Karlsson
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.