Şehnaz Tezcan1, Nihal Uslu2, Funda Ulu Öztürk2, Eda Yılmaz Akçay3, Tugan Tezcaner4. 1. Department of Radiology, Koru Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. 2. Department of Radiology, Başkent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. 3. Department of Pathology, Başkent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. 4. Department of General Surgery, Başkent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma (BC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 83 patients were enrolled in this study. Prognostic factors included age, tumor size, expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), nuclear grade (NG), lymph node involvement and histologic type. The relationship between ADC and prognostic factors was determined using Independent sample t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation and relative operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between ADC and prognostic factors, including age, tumor size, ER, HER2 and histologic type. The PR-positive tumors (p=0.03) and axillary lymph node involvement (p=0.000) showed a significant association with lower ADC values. The ADC values were significantly lower in high-grade tumors than low-grade tumors (p=0.000). ROC analysis showed an optimal ADC threshold of 0.66 (×10-3 mm2/s) for differentiating low-grade tumors from high-grade tumors (sensitivity, 85.5%; specificity, 81%; area under curve, 0.90). CONCLUSION: The lower ADC values of BC were significantly associated with positive expression of PR, LN positivity and high-grade tumor. Especially, ADC values were valuable in predicting NG subgroups.
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma (BC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 83 patients were enrolled in this study. Prognostic factors included age, tumor size, expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), nuclear grade (NG), lymph node involvement and histologic type. The relationship between ADC and prognostic factors was determined using Independent sample t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation and relative operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between ADC and prognostic factors, including age, tumor size, ER, HER2 and histologic type. The PR-positive tumors (p=0.03) and axillary lymph node involvement (p=0.000) showed a significant association with lower ADC values. The ADC values were significantly lower in high-grade tumors than low-grade tumors (p=0.000). ROC analysis showed an optimal ADC threshold of 0.66 (×10-3 mm2/s) for differentiating low-grade tumors from high-grade tumors (sensitivity, 85.5%; specificity, 81%; area under curve, 0.90). CONCLUSION: The lower ADC values of BC were significantly associated with positive expression of PR, LN positivity and high-grade tumor. Especially, ADC values were valuable in predicting NG subgroups.
Authors: Ann H Partridge; Melissa E Hughes; Erica T Warner; Rebecca A Ottesen; Yu-Ning Wong; Stephen B Edge; Richard L Theriault; Douglas W Blayney; Joyce C Niland; Eric P Winer; Jane C Weeks; Rulla M Tamimi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lyndsay Harris; Herbert Fritsche; Robert Mennel; Larry Norton; Peter Ravdin; Sheila Taube; Mark R Somerfield; Daniel F Hayes; Robert C Bast Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hee Jung Shin; Hak Hee Kim; Ki Chang Shin; Yoo Sub Sung; Joo Hee Cha; Jong Won Lee; Byung Ho Son; Sei Hyun Ahn Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Ashley M Mendez; Lauren K Fang; Claire H Meriwether; Summer J Batasin; Stéphane Loubrie; Ana E Rodríguez-Soto; Rebecca A Rakow-Penner Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 5.738