Literature DB >> 6653601

Factors influencing bone scan quality.

F G Adams, A W Shirley.   

Abstract

A reliable subjective method of assessing bone scan quality is described. A large number of variables which theoretically could influence scan quality were submitted to regression and factor analysis. Obesity, age, sex and abnormality of scan were found to be significant but weak variables.

Mesh：

Year:  1983        PMID： 6653601     DOI： 10.1007/BF00252942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN： 0340-6997


  10 in total

1.  A clinical comparison of 2 h and 4 h bone scans obtained with 99Tc H.E.D.P.

Authors:  I Fogelman; C Goll; J H McKillop; D L Citrin; W R Greig
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1978

2.  The effect of age on the quality of bone scans using technetium-99m pyrophosphate.

Authors:  M A Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The effect of radiopharmaceutical incubation time on bone scan quality.

Authors:  R E Henkin; A Woodruff; W Chang; A M Green
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Technetium-99m-labeled methylene diphosphonate and hydroxyethylidine diphosphonate--biologic and clinical comparison: concise communication.

Authors:  T G Rudd; D R Allen; F D Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  A computer assisted comparison of 99Tcm-methylene-diphosphonate and 99Tcm-pyrophosphate bone imaging.

Authors:  U Büll; J P Pfeifer; H P Niendorf; J Tongendorff
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  A critical assessment of bone scan quantitation (bone to soft tissue ratios) in the diagnosis of metabolic bone disease.

Authors:  I Fogelman; R G Bessent; D Gordon
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1981-03

7.  The effect of iron on the biodistribution of bone scanning agents in humans.

Authors:  D Choy; I P Murray; R Hoschl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  A radiopharmaceutical and clinical comparison of 99mTc-Sn-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate with 99mTc-Sn-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate.

Authors:  E B Silberstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The clinical comparison of skeletal imaging agents.

Authors:  F G Adams; P W Horton; G Stenhouse
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1980-06

10.  Effects of dissolved oxygen on Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate: concise communication.

Authors:  J J Coupal; E E Kim; F H DeLand
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 10.057
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.