Literature DB >> 6649417

Spatial localization in normal and amblyopic vision.

D M Levi, S A Klein.   

Abstract

Spatial localization was investigated for each eye of amblyopic observers using a bisection paradigm. The stimuli were comprised of a grating composed of bright lines, and a test line. The test line was either placed above the grating (bisection-no overlap) or within the row of lines comprising the grating (bisection-with overlap) and thresholds for each bisection task were measured as a function of the fundamental spatial frequency of the grating. Vernier thresholds were also measured. For the nonamblyopic eyes at low spatial frequencies, bisection thresholds were a constant fraction ("Weber" fraction) of the space to be bisected, while at high spatial frequencies thresholds were approximately a constant retinal distance (a hyperacuity). However the spatial localization of an amblyopic eye depends upon both the type of amblyopia, and the stimulus configuration. Specifically, for anisometropic amblyopia, spatial localization (bisection-no overlap) and vernier, when scaled to the resolution losses, were normal. However, spatial adjacency (bisection with overlap), while enhancing the spatial localization of nonamblyopic eyes at high spatial frequencies, markedly elevated thresholds in the amblyopic eyes of anisometropic amblyopes. Strabismic amblyopes on the other hand show disturbances in both spatial localization tasks which can not be accounted for on the basis of reduced resolution. Their results are characterized by an absence of a constant Weber fraction at low spatial frequencies and "crowding" effects at high spatial frequencies. For strabismic amblyopes, the optimal localization thresholds were similar to the Snellen threshold, while for anisometropic amblyopes, the optimal localization thresholds were several times better than the Snellen threshold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6649417     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90011-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  23 in total

1.  The cortical deficit in humans with strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  G R Barnes; R F Hess; S O Dumoulin; R L Achtman; G B Pike
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The classification of amblyopia on the basis of visual and oculomotor performance.

Authors:  S P McKee; C M Schor; S B Steinman; N Wilson; G G Koch; S M Davis; C Hsu-Winges; S H Day; C L Chan; J A Movshon
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1992

3.  False reaching movements in localization test and effect of auditory feedback in simulated ultra-low vision subjects and patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Takao Endo; Hiroyuki Kanda; Masakazu Hirota; Takeshi Morimoto; Kohji Nishida; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Identification of contrast-defined letters benefits from perceptual learning in adults with amblyopia.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Roger W Li; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Linking assumptions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Comparison of line and space bisection in evaluation of normal and amblyopic spatial vision.

Authors:  S E Graefe; W Haase
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Characteristics of fixational eye movements in amblyopia: Limitations on fixation stability and acuity?

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Girish Kumar; Roger W Li; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Early monocular defocus disrupts the normal development of receptive-field structure in V2 neurons of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Tao; Bin Zhang; Guofu Shen; Janice Wensveen; Earl L Smith; Shinji Nishimoto; Izumi Ohzawa; Yuzo M Chino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Effects of anisometropic amblyopia on visuomotor behavior, part 2: visually guided reaching.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Herbert C Goltz; Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra Hirji; J Douglas Crawford; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Differential spatial displacement discrimination with interfering stimuli.

Authors:  A Toet; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.