Literature DB >> 6646667

Electrocochleography: using extratympanic or transtympanic methods?

R Probst.   

Abstract

The advantages and disadvantages of the transtympanic and extratympanic methods for recording electrocochleographic potentials (ECochG) are discussed. Our extra-tympanic method (adapted from Coats) and some results are presented. We conclude that for broad clinical application an ear canal surface electrode is the method of choice for recording ECochG, unless the primary question is one of threshold measurement. If the registration of brainstem potentials from the vertex does not show a potential I, we recommend simultaneous recording of ECochG by an extratympanic method with earphones.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6646667     DOI: 10.1159/000275662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec        ISSN: 0301-1569            Impact factor:   1.538


  2 in total

1.  Response pattern based on the amplitude of ear canal recorded cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal hearing subjects.

Authors:  Ming Zhang
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-06-13

2.  Noninvasive detection of alarming intracranial pressure changes by auditory monitoring in early management of brain injury: a prospective invasive versus noninvasive study.

Authors:  Fabrice Giraudet; François Longeras; Aurélien Mulliez; Aurélie Thalamy; Bruno Pereira; Paul Avan; Laurent Sakka
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 9.097

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.