Literature DB >> 6641846

A comparison of the shift response of X- and Y-cells in the cat's retina.

D I Hamasaki, I Hanada.   

Abstract

The shift response (McIlwain or peripheral effect) was elicited by either flashing or shifting a grating while the receptive field (RF) was covered by a 30 degree mask in the cat. The responses elicited by shifting the grating was comparable to that elicited by flashing the grating. In 10% of the units, the on- and off-responses elicited by flashing the grating were unequal in amplitude. The larger response corresponded with the light phase which leads to excitation of the surround mechanism of the RF. The maximum firing rates of the shift response did not differ in the different types of units, but the amplitude of the shift response (maximum - maintained firing rates) was significantly larger in Y-cells. For all types of cells, the amplitude of the shift response increased with greater eccentricity of the RF. A strong inhibitory period was found in on-center Y-cells but not in the other types of cells. The latency of the shift response was significantly shorter in Y-cells. The differences in the responses of X- and Y-cells suggest that the lateral pathways used are different for the X- and Y-cells.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6641846     DOI: 10.1007/BF00238238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Slow potentials induced from the illuminated part into the surrounding area of the retina.

Authors:  K MOTOKAWA; T OIKAWA; T OGAWA
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  1959-06-25

2.  The amacrine cell.

Authors:  R Y Chan; K Naka
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The effects of remote retinal stimulation on the responses of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  H B Barlow; A M Derrington; L R Harris; P Lennie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The mechanism of peripherally evoked responses in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  A M Derrington; P Lennie; M J Wright
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Improved use of tapetal reflection for eye-position monitoring.

Authors:  J D Pettigrew; M L Cooper; G G Blasdel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Brisk and sluggish concentrically organized ganglion cells in the cat's retina.

Authors:  B G Cleland; W R Levick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Rod and cone pathways in the inner plexiform layer of cat retina.

Authors:  H Kolb; E V Famiglietti
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Synapses onto different morphological types of retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  R W West; J E Dowling
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-11-03       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Shift-effect in the rabbit retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  J Watanabe; K Tasaki
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-01-06       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Amacrine cells of the cat retina.

Authors:  H Kolb; R Nelson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bipolar cells contribute to nonlinear spatial summation in the brisk-transient (Y) ganglion cell in mammalian retina.

Authors:  J B Demb; K Zaghloul; L Haarsma; P Sterling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The periphery effect in cat retinal ganglion cells: variation with functional class and eccentricity.

Authors:  D H Rapaport; J Stone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Contributions of inhibitory mechanisms to the shift responses of X and Y cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  U T Eysel; H C Pape; R Van Schayck
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.182

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.