Literature DB >> 3402569

The periphery effect in cat retinal ganglion cells: variation with functional class and eccentricity.

D H Rapaport1, J Stone.   

Abstract

We have studied the responses of ganglion cells of the cat retina to visual stimulation remote from the center of their receptive field. Following previous work, this response is termed the periphery effect (PE). Cells were identified as Y-, X- or W-class from the latency of their response to optic chiasm stimulation and from their receptive field properties. The strength of the PE elicited by a rotating windmill or counterphased grating stimulus was measured for ganglion cells of all major classes. The PE was consistently stronger in Y- than in X-cells, and the strength of the effect in both X- and Y-cells increased significantly with retinal eccentricity. A PE was elicited from about 47% of W-cells studied. In some (36%) the effect was excitatory, as for X- and Y-cells; in others (11%) it was inhibitory. Despite this heterogeneity, the PE in W-cells increased significantly with eccentricity. These variations of the PE with eccentricity and cell class have implications for the circuitry of the inner plexiform layer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3402569     DOI: 10.1007/bf00271849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  42 in total

1.  RETINAL GANGLION CELLS RESPONDING SELECTIVELY TO DIRECTION AND SPEED OF IMAGE MOTION IN THE RABBIT.

Authors:  H B BARLOW; R M HILL; W R LEVICK
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The amacrine cell.

Authors:  R Y Chan; K Naka
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The effects of remote retinal stimulation on the responses of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  H B Barlow; A M Derrington; L R Harris; P Lennie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Sustained and transient neurones in the cat's retina and lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  B G Cleland; M W Dubin; W R Levick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Number and distribution of putative cholinergic neurons in the cat retina.

Authors:  M Schmidt; H Wässle; M Humphrey
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1985-09-06       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Distribution of catecholaminergic cells in the retina of the rat, guinea pig, cat, and rabbit: independence from ganglion cell distribution.

Authors:  J Mitrofanis; A Vigny; J Stone
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Morphology and distribution of tyrosine hydroxylase-like immunoreactive neurons in the cat retina.

Authors:  C W Oyster; E S Takahashi; M Cilluffo; N C Brecha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  'Starburst' amacrine cells and cholinergic neurons: mirror-symmetric on and off amacrine cells of rabbit retina.

Authors:  E V Famiglietti
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1983-02-14       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Electron microscopic analysis of amacrine and bipolar cell inputs on Y-, X-, and W-cells in the cat retina.

Authors:  M Watanabe; Y Fukuda; C F Hsiao; H Ito
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-12-09       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Amacrine cells, bipolar cells and ganglion cells of the cat retina: a Golgi study.

Authors:  H Kolb; R Nelson; A Mariani
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of remote stimulation on the mean firing rate of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  C L Passaglia; C Enroth-Cugell; J B Troy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Responses from outside classical receptive fields of dorsal lateral geniculate cells in rabbits.

Authors:  S Molotchnikoff; A Cérat
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of remote stimulation on the modulated activity of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Christopher L Passaglia; Daniel K Freeman; John B Troy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.