Literature DB >> 6639977

Feedback and incentive effects on the decrease of interbeat interval.

D W Johnston, J Lethem.   

Abstract

Johnston and Lethem (1981) have hypothesized that when subjects attempt to decrease their interbeat interval (i.e., increase their heart rate) maximally, then interbeat interval feedback has a purely motivational role, but when they attempt to decrease their interbeat interval by a precise amount, such feedback has a primarily informational role. This was tested by comparing the performance of 16 subjects on both types of task. It was predicted that additional monetary incentives would reduce the difference between feedback and no-feedback conditions when subjects were attempting to reduce interbeat interval maximally but not when attempting to reduce it by a specific amount. This prediction was not supported. Incentive was found to aid performance on the maximal interbeat interval decrease task, but this was independent of the effects of feedback. Only feedback effects were detected on the specific interbeat interval decrease task.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6639977     DOI: 10.1007/BF00998855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul        ISSN: 0363-3586


  3 in total

1.  Heart rate regulation as skill learning: strength-endurance versus cardiac reaction time.

Authors:  G E Schwartz; L D Young; J Volger
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Heart rate and blood pressure biofeedback: II. A review and integration of recent theoretical models.

Authors:  D A Williamson; E B Blanchard
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1979-03

3.  The production of specific decreases in interbeat interval and the motor skills analogy.

Authors:  D W Johnston; J Lethem
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.016

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.