Literature DB >> 6628619

Dynamic pupillary response controlled by the pupil size effect.

F Sun, P Tauchi, L Stark.   

Abstract

Pupillary escape has been described as an initial contraction followed by a slow redilatation, occurring in response to a step stimulus of low-intensity light. When the initial pupil size is small, the response to the same step stimulus is pupillary capture, a steady and sustained contraction. In this experiment a comparison was made between three modes of controlling pupil size and thereby of regulating the pupillary response: contralateral light background level, ipsilateral light background level, and accommodative level with which there is no change in retinal adaptation. All three level setting modes showed similar results in illustrating the pupil size effect. In addition, an inhibitory effect was found with both ipsilateral and contralateral light backgrounds that is independent of Weber's Law in the contralateral case. Our results lead to the formulation of a binocular model, featuring an internal parameter control whereby a signal dependent on the static pupil size regulates the gains of the parallel phasic and tonic pathways, the former responsive to transient changes of light, and the latter to background levels of light and accommodative levels. Our findings also raise interesting questions concerning the loci of these complex interactions in the simple neuroanatomy of the pupillary pathways.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6628619     DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(83)90404-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  9 in total

1.  Pupil responses to near visual demand during human visual development.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Jingyun Wang; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Estimation of autonomic nervous activity using the inverse dynamic model of the pupil muscle plant.

Authors:  S Usui; Y Hirata
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Systems model for pupil size effect. II. Feedback model.

Authors:  W C Krenz; L Stark
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  The binocular intraocular lens power difference in eyes with different axial lengths.

Authors:  Ming-Hui Deng; Xiao-Gang Wang; Song Chen; Xue-Feng Shi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 1.645

Review 5.  Pupil Size as a Window on Neural Substrates of Cognition.

Authors:  Siddhartha Joshi; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Studying the effect of iris mechanics on the pupillary light reflex using brimonidine-induced anisocoria.

Authors:  Yanjun Chen; Randy H Kardon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Shaping the pupil's response to light in the hooded rat.

Authors:  Robert J Clarke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Pupillary responses to single and sinusoidal light stimuli in diabetic patients.

Authors:  Wolfgang H Zangemeister; Thilo Gronow; Ulrich Grzyska
Journal:  Neurol Int       Date:  2009-11-16

9.  Patterns of Pupillary Activity During Binocular Disparity Resolution.

Authors:  Carey D Balaban; Alex Kiderman; Mikhaylo Szczupak; Robin C Ashmore; Michael E Hoffer
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.003

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.