Literature DB >> 6620519

Cesarean section. Risk and benefits for mother and fetus.

B P Sachs, B J McCarthy, G Rubin, A Burton, J Terry, C W Tyler.   

Abstract

We studied the effects of cesarean section on neonatal mortality for breech infants and low--birth weight vertex infants using data from the Georgia neonatal surveillance network on 392,241 singleton deliveries between 1974 and 1978. The risk of neonatal death for breech infants weighing 4,000 g or less delivered vaginally was significantly higher than the risk for those delivered by cesarean section. The lower the birth weight, the higher the risk for a vaginal breech delivery. For breech infants weighing 1,000 to 2,500 g, the risk was almost 21/2 times greater for a vaginal delivery v a cesarean delivery. The best outcome for high-risk vertex infants weighing 1,000 to 1,500 g was for those delivered by cesarean section in a tertiary perinatal center. An increase in the cesarean section rate may be associated with increased neonatal survival; however, the benefits must be weighed against the costs of an increased maternal mortality and morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6620519     DOI: 10.1001/jama.250.16.2157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  11 in total

1.  Breech presentation. Fetal loss associated with intended vaginal delivery.

Authors:  S Ong; P McKenna
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  The premature breech: caesarean section or trial of labour?

Authors:  G Anderson; C Strong
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Effect of cesarean section on outcome in high- and low-risk very preterm infants.

Authors:  J Dietl; H Arnold; H Mentzel; H A Hirsch
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  ACOG reflects on the National Natality and Fetal Mortality Surveys.

Authors:  E Nichols
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Non-pregnant patients' preference for delivery route.

Authors:  Andrea R Thurman; James S Zoller; Steven E Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-05-14

6.  Method of delivery and neonatal mortality among very low birth weight infants in the United States.

Authors:  Pradip K Muhuri; Marian F Macdorman; Fay Menacker
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-01

7.  Electronic fetal monitoring in relation to cesarean section delivery, for live births and stillbirths in the U.S., 1980.

Authors:  P J Placek; K G Keppel; S M Taffel; T L Liss
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Delivery of very premature infants: does the caesarean section rate relate to mortality, morbidity, or long-term outcome?

Authors:  J Dietl; H Arnold; G Haas; H Mentzel; B Pietsch-Breitfeld; H A Hirsch
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Outcome of breech delivery at term.

Authors:  J G Thorpe-Beeston; P J Banfield; N J Saunders
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-26

10.  Assessment of Variation in Cesarean Delivery Rates Between Public and Private Health Facilities in India From 2005 to 2016.

Authors:  Mrigesh Bhatia; Kajori Banerjee; Priyanka Dixit; Laxmi Kant Dwivedi
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.