Literature DB >> 6619169

Changes in knee function associated with treadmill ambulation.

G M Strathy, E Y Chao, R K Laughman.   

Abstract

A comparison of level walking, on a walkway and on a treadmill, was performed using ten normal subjects. Motion about the knee was measured using a triaxial electrogoniometer, and foot-floor contact patterns were recorded by means of four foot switches attached to the sole of each shoe. On the walkway, the data were collected with the subject moving at a comfortable walking speed. The treadmill was then set at the average velocity obtained on the walkway. Knee joint rotation in the coronal and transverse planes did not change significantly between the walkway and the treadmill. In the sagittal plane, significant differences were found for total motion (p less than 0.01), swing phase motion (p less than 0.01), knee position at heel strike (p less than 0.05), and maximum swing phase extension (p less than 0.01). A comparison of the foot-floor contact patterns between walkway and treadmill ambulation revealed reduced heel contact time, with an increase in toe contact while on the treadmill. It was concluded that sagittal plane knee kinematics during level treadmill walking differ significantly from level overground walking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6619169     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(83)90066-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  14 in total

Review 1.  The effectiveness of walking as an intervention for low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  P Hendrick; A M Te Wake; A S Tikkisetty; L Wulff; C Yap; S Milosavljevic
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Can treadmill walking be used to assess propulsion generation?

Authors:  Evan J Goldberg; Steven A Kautz; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Coordination between upper- and lower-limb movements is different during overground and treadmill walking.

Authors:  Ilaria Carpinella; Paolo Crenna; Marco Rabuffetti; Maurizio Ferrarin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Influence of contextual task constraints on preferred stride parameters and their variabilities during human walking.

Authors:  Lauro V Ojeda; John R Rebula; Arthur D Kuo; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Tibiofemoral kinematics and condylar motion during the stance phase of gait.

Authors:  Michal Kozanek; Ali Hosseini; Fang Liu; Samuel K Van de Velde; Thomas J Gill; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Kinematic variability, fractal dynamics and local dynamic stability of treadmill walking.

Authors:  Philippe Terrier; Olivier Dériaz
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Gait event detection on level ground and incline walking using a rate gyroscope.

Authors:  Paola Catalfamo; Salim Ghoussayni; David Ewins
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Dynamic navicular motion measured using a stretch sensor is different between walking and running, and between over-ground and treadmill conditions.

Authors:  Christian J Barton; Simon L Kappel; Peter Ahrendt; Ole Simonsen; Michael S Rathleff
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Comparison of walking overground and in a Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN) in individuals with and without transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Deanna H Gates; Benjamin J Darter; Jonathan B Dingwell; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Gait characteristics of subjects with chronic fatigue syndrome and controls at self-selected and matched velocities.

Authors:  Lorna Paul; Danny Rafferty; Leslie Wood; William Maclaren
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.