Literature DB >> 6610563

Biological age and its estimation. III. Introduction of a correction to the multiple regression model of biological age in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.

T L Dubina, E V Zhuk.   

Abstract

In order to eliminate systematic error inherent in assessment of an individual biological age (BA), a correction is suggested for the multiple regression model of BA. The larger the difference between an individual's chronological age and middle age of the sample, the greater the correction value. BA estimates of apparently healthy people of 60 to 100 years were assessed using measurements of three physiological indices: hand grip strength, short-time memory, and vibrotactile sensitivity. Introduction of the correction allowed comparison of BA estimates of the same individual obtained from repeated observations. Preliminary results show there are at least four types of the BA changes with advancing age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6610563     DOI: 10.1016/0531-5565(84)90016-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Gerontol        ISSN: 0531-5565            Impact factor:   4.032


  15 in total

1.  Age variation in the upper limit of hearing.

Authors:  S Takeda; I Morioka; K Miyashita; A Okumura; Y Yoshida; K Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

2.  Select aging biomarkers based on telomere length and chronological age to build a biological age equation.

Authors:  Wei-Guang Zhang; Shu-Ying Zhu; Xiao-Juan Bai; De-Long Zhao; Shi-Min Jian; Juan Li; Zuo-Xiang Li; Bo Fu; Guang-Yan Cai; Xue-Feng Sun; Xiang-Mei Chen
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2014-06

3.  Effects of habitual physical exercise on physiological age in men aged 20-85 years as estimated using principal component analysis.

Authors:  E Nakamura; T Moritani; A Kanetaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

4.  Biological age versus physical fitness age.

Authors:  E Nakamura; T Moritani; A Kanetaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

5.  Constructing an index of physical fitness age for Japanese elderly based on 7-year longitudinal data: sex differences in estimated physical fitness age.

Authors:  Misaka Kimura; Chinatsu Mizuta; Yosuke Yamada; Yasuko Okayama; Eitaro Nakamura
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2011-03-22

6.  Biological age versus physical fitness age in women.

Authors:  E Nakamura; T Moritani; A Kanetaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

7.  A Model for Estimating Biological Age From Physiological Biomarkers of Healthy Aging: Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Karina Louise Skov Husted; Andreas Brink-Kjær; Mathilde Fogelstrøm; Pernille Hulst; Akita Bleibach; Kaj-Åge Henneberg; Helge Bjarup Dissing Sørensen; Flemming Dela; Jens Christian Brings Jacobsen; Jørn Wulff Helge
Journal:  JMIR Aging       Date:  2022-05-10

8.  Models for estimating the metabolic syndrome biological age as the new index for evaluation and management of metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Young Gon Kang; Eunkyung Suh; Hyejin Chun; Sun-Hyun Kim; Deog Ki Kim; Chul-Young Bae
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Biological age as a health index for mortality and major age-related disease incidence in Koreans: National Health Insurance Service - Health screening 11-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Young Gon Kang; Eunkyung Suh; Jae-Woo Lee; Dong Wook Kim; Kyung Hee Cho; Chul-Young Bae
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Developing an assessment based on physical fitness age to evaluate motor function in frail and healthy elderly women.

Authors:  Masaki Nakagaichi; Yuya Anan; Yuto Hikiji; Sou Uratani
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.