Literature DB >> 6606997

Narcotic requirements for intravenous anesthesia.

J E Wynands, P Wong, G E Townsend, J S Sprigge, D G Whalley.   

Abstract

MAC BAR, the minimum end-tidal alveolar anesthetic concentration that inhibits adrenergic response to a noxious stimulus in 50% of subjects, is a quantifiable physiological parameter that can be used to determine potency and therapeutic indices of volatile anesthetics. We wished to determine whether there is a minimal intraarterial plasma concentration (MIC BAR) of an opiate such as fentanyl that will prevent a hypertensive response to noxious stimuli in 50% of patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery (ACBP). Forty-three patients with good left ventricular function were studied. All patients were premedicated with diazepam, morphine, and scopolamine. Five groups of patients were anesthetized with different fentanyl anesthesia protocols, each designed to produce different plasma fentanyl concentrations (PFC). A 20% increase in systolic blood pressure compared to control was considered an adrenergic response that related to the plasma fentanyl concentration inferred from each patient's PFC time-concentration curve. Only four patients became hypertensive with a PFC greater than 20 ng/ml. One patient became hypertensive at intubation with a PFC of 12.3 ng/ml. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean PFC in patients who became hypertensive at each event. During aortic dissection, when significantly more patients became hypertensive, there was no difference in the incidence of hypertension in patients with a PFC above or below 20 ng/ml. Two patients became hypertensive at skin incision with a PFC over 30 ng/ml. A MIC BAR could not be identified because of the great variability in the PFC of patients who became hypertensive.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6606997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  8 in total

Review 1.  Intravenous anaesthetic agents. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships.

Authors:  B N Swerdlow; F O Holley
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Choice of anaesthetic regimen influences haemodynamic response to cemented arthroplasty.

Authors:  C B Guest; R J Byrick; C D Mazer; D F Wigglesworth; J B Mullen; J H Tong
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Pharmacokinetics of alfentanil and clinical responses during cardiac surgery.

Authors:  G R Robbins; J E Wynands; D G Whalley; F Donati; J G Ramsay; C B Srikant; Y C Patel
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 4.  Practical treatment recommendations for the safe use of anaesthetics.

Authors:  J W Sear
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Is lower esophageal contractility a reliable indicator of the adequacy of opioid anesthesia?

Authors:  I M Schwieger; C C Hug; R I Hall; F Szlam
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1989-07

6.  A randomized double-blind comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil anaesthesia for coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  I R Thomson; R J Hudson; M Rosenbloom; R C Meatherall
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Fentanyl oxygen anaesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  R M Friesen; I R Thomson; R J Hudson; M Rosenbloom; C L Putnins; J E Cannon
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-11

8.  Ultrasound-guided erector spinae interfascial plane block for spinal surgery in three cats.

Authors:  Diego N Alza Salvatierra; Manuel E Herrera Linares; Luca Motta; Miguel Martinez
Journal:  JFMS Open Rep       Date:  2021-09-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.