Literature DB >> 6604152

Compensatory eye movements during active and passive head movements: fast adaptation to changes in visual magnification.

H Collewijn, A J Martins, R M Steinman.   

Abstract

Rotational eye and head movements were recorded with great precision with scleral and cranial search coils in a rotating magnetic field. Compensatory eye movements were recorded in light and darkness during active as well as passive head movements in the frequency range 0.33-1.33 Hz. From the recorded, nominal gaze movements the effective gaze was reconstructed taking into account magnification or reduction factors of corrective spectacles. Effective gain was calculated as the ratio between the velocities of the effective corrective eye movements and the head movements. In the light, effective gain of compensatory eye movements during active head motion was mostly between 0.97 and 1.03. It was never precisely unity and differed systematically between subjects and between the two eyes of each subject. During passive head motion in the light, gain was lower by about 3% than during active motion. During active head movement in the dark, gain was mostly between 0.92 and 1.00; values were about 5% lower than during active motion in the light. During passive head movement in the dark, gain was about 13% lower than during active motion, and the variability of the oculomotor response increased. Adaptation of these base-line conditions was induced by fitting the subjects with magnifying or reducing spectacles for periods of 40 min to 24 h. The largest required change in amplitude of eye movements was 36%. When active head movements were made, the amplitude of compensatory eye movements in the light as well as in the dark adjusted rapidly. Most of the adaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex in the dark was completed in about 30 min. This rate is much faster than that found in previous experiments requiring larger adaptive changes. Differential adaptation to unequal demands for the two eyes proved to be very hard or impossible. In a mild conflict situation the system adjusted to an intermediate level, distributing the error symmetrically between the eyes. When the discrepancy was large, the adaptive process of both eyes was controlled by the one eye which provided the most meaningful information. It is concluded that the system generating compensatory eye movements performs best during active rather than passive head movements, and that adaptation to moderate changes in optimal gain are made very rapidly.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6604152      PMCID: PMC1199209          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  22 in total

1.  Adaptation of the human vestibuloocular reflex to magnifying lenses.

Authors:  G M Gauthier; D A Robinson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-07-11       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Adaptation of cat vestibulo-ocular reflex to 200 days of optically reversed vision.

Authors:  G M Jones; P Davies
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-02-27       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Precise recording of human eye movements.

Authors:  H Collewijn; F van der Mark; T C Jansen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Voluntary, non-visual control of the human vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  C C Barr; L W Schultheis; D A Robinson
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1976 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Gain of the vestibulo-ocular reflex in monkey at high rotational frequencies.

Authors:  E L Keller
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Adaptive plasticity in the vestibulo-ocular responses of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  F A Miles; J H Fuller
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-11-22       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Neural design of the cerebellar motor control system.

Authors:  M Ito
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1972-05-12       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Adaptive gain control of vestibuloocular reflex by the cerebellum.

Authors:  D A Robinson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cervical and vestibular afferent control of oculomotor response in man.

Authors:  G R Barnes; L N Forbat
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Eye- and head movements in freely moving rabbits.

Authors:  H Collewijn
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  34 in total

1.  The influence of visual input on the vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  J Bosman; M P Ten Tusscher; H Kingma
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Report on a workshop concerning the cerebellum and motor learning, held in St Louis October 2004.

Authors:  Stephen M Highstein; John Porrill; Paul Dean
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Dynamic visual acuity during passive head thrusts in canal planes.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; Americo A Migliaccio; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-06-30

4.  Modification of compensatory saccades after aVOR gain recovery.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; Americo A Migliaccio; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Visually-induced adaptive plasticity in the human vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  G D Paige; E W Sargent
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Optically induced plasticity of the cervico-ocular reflex in patients with bilateral absence of vestibular function.

Authors:  S Heimbrand; A M Bronstein; M A Gresty; M E Faldon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The vestibulo-ocular reflex during active head motion in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Michael S Salman; Linda Lillakas; Maureen Dennis; Martin J Steinbach; James A Sharpe
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 8.  The significance of microsaccades for vision and oculomotor control.

Authors:  Han Collewijn; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The effects of head and trunk position on torsional vestibular and optokinetic eye movements in humans.

Authors:  M J Morrow; J A Sharpe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Head movements during optokinetic stimulation in the alert rabbit.

Authors:  J H Fuller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.