Literature DB >> 6601650

Cefotetan: in-vitro antibacterial activity and susceptibility to beta-lactamases.

I Phillips, A King, K Shannon, C Warren.   

Abstract

The in-vitro antibacterial activity of cefotetan was assessed against recent clinical isolates of common bacteria and also against reference strains that produced known beta-lactamases. The compound was active against most staphylococci (MICs 4 to 8 mg/l) though methicillin-resistant strains were less sensitive. It was also generally active against streptococci (MICs mostly in the range 1 to 16 mg/l). However, enterococci and penicillin-resistant pneumococci were resistant. Cefotetan was highly active against enterobacteria, with 75% of isolates inhibited by 0.5 mg/l and 90% inhibited by 4 mg/l. It was also highly active against Haemophilus influenzae (MICs 0.5 to 4 mg/l) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (MICs 0.06 to 2 mg/l) but had relatively poor activity against Acinetobacter spp. (MICs mostly 4 to 128 mg/l). Cefotetan had little useful activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MICs 16 to 512 mg/l) but was more active against most other pseudomonads. Cefotetan had moderate activity against the Bacteroides fragilis group (MICs mostly less than or equal to 32 mg/l), though Bact. fragilis sensu stricto and Bact. vulgatus were more sensitive (MICs usually less than or equal to 4 mg/l). It was more active against most other anaerobes, though its activity was always exceeded by that of ampicillin. Cefotetan possessed a high degree of resistance to both plasmid-mediated and chromosomally-determined beta-lactamases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6601650     DOI: 10.1093/jac/11.suppl_a.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  8 in total

1.  Effects of N-methyl-thiotetrazole cephalosporin on haemostasis in patients with reduced serum vitamin K1 concentrations.

Authors:  I J Mackie; K Walshe; H Cohen; P McCarthy; M Shearer; S D Scott; S J Karran; S J Machin
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  In vitro antibacterial effects of cephalosporins.

Authors:  J D Williams; F Moosdeen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Toxicity and clearance of intravitreal cefotetan.

Authors:  W Philipp; K Schmid; H J Steiner; B Pümpel; F Allerberger; H P Aichberger; W Mayer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Cefotetan. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  A Ward; D M Richards
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Antibacterial therapy in patients with malignancies.

Authors:  K H Mayer; S M Opal
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.264

6.  In vitro activity of cefotetan compared with that of other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  H M Wexler; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Annual incidence, epidemiology, and comparative in vitro susceptibilities to cefoxitin, cefotetan, cefmetazole, and ceftizoxime of recent community-acquired isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

Authors:  E J Goldstein; D M Citron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  In Vitro Activity of Cefotetan against ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Isolates from the MERINO Trial.

Authors:  Adam G Stewart; Kyra Cottrell; Andrew Henderson; Kanthi Vemuri; Michelle J Bauer; David L Paterson; Patrick N A Harris
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-07-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.