Literature DB >> 6584177

Uncertainty in cephalometrics.

A M Cohen.   

Abstract

Sources of cephalometric error are considered, and different techniques of measurement are discussed. The use of the digitizer on tracings, untraced films and modified tracings is evaluated with regard to reproducibility of cephalometric angles and co-ordinates.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1984        PMID： 6584177     DOI： 10.1179/bjo.11.1.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Orthod        ISSN： 0301-228X


  5 in total

1.  The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods.

Authors:  S F Albarakati; K S Kula; A A Ghoneima
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.

Authors:  Vandana Kumar; John Ludlow; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; André Mol
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Three-dimensional analysis of changes of the malar-midfacial region after LeFort I osteotomy and maxillary advancement.

Authors:  Emeka Nkenke; Eleftherios Vairaktaris; Manuel Kramer; Andreas Schlegel; Alexandra Holst; Ursula Hirschfelder; Jörg Wiltfang; Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam; Marc Stamminger
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-05

4.  Comparison of an imaging software and manual prediction of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  M S Ahmad Akhoundi; G Shirani; M Arshad; H Heidar; A Sodagar
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2012-09-30

Review 5.  Comparison of the Reliability of Anatomic Landmarks based on PA Cephalometric Radiographs and 3D CT Scans in Patients with Facial Asymmetry.

Authors:  Kamal Bajaj; Pooja Rathee; Pradeep Jain; Vasim Raja Panwar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2011-04-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.