Literature DB >> 6547735

An acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant.

P J Blamey, R C Dowell, Y C Tong, G M Clark.   

Abstract

A set of bandpass filtered, pulsed noise stimuli presented to three normally hearing subjects was found to have psychophysical properties similar to those of a set of pulsed electrical stimuli presented to two cochlear implant patients. Identical procedures were used to compare the performances of the two groups of subjects in the following tasks: (a) pulse rate difference limen measurements, (b) pitch scaling for stimuli differing in pulse rate, (c) pitch scaling and categorization of stimuli differing in filter frequency or electrode position, and (d) similarity judgments of stimuli differing in pulse rate and filter frequency or electrode position. By choosing the parameters of the acoustic stimuli appropriately, a high level of agreement between the two sets of results was achieved. Electrical stimuli on electrodes at different sites in the cochlea were matched with pulsed noise passed through bandpass filters with different center frequencies. Matching was achieved for equal electrical and acoustic pulse rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6547735     DOI: 10.1121/1.391012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

Review 1.  The multiple-channel cochlear implant: the interface between sound and the central nervous system for hearing, speech, and language in deaf people-a personal perspective.

Authors:  Graeme M Clark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Valid Acoustic Models of Cochlear Implants: One Size Does Not Fit All.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Nicole Hope Capach; Jonathan D Neukam; Mahan Azadpour; Elad Sagi; Ariel Edward Hight; E Katelyn Glassman; Annette Lavender; Keena P Seward; Margaret K Miller; Nai Ding; Chin-Tuan Tan; Matthew B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Reducing interaural tonotopic mismatch preserves binaural unmasking in cochlear implant simulations of single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Mahan Azadpour; Jonathan Neukam; Nicole Hope Capach; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Mandarin Chinese tone identification in cochlear implants: predictions from acoustic models.

Authors:  Kenneth D Morton; Peter A Torrione; Chandra S Throckmorton; Leslie M Collins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Place-Pitch Interval Perception With a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Natalia Stupak; Ann E Todd; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The sound sensation of apical electric stimulation in cochlear implant recipients with contralateral residual hearing.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Jeremy Marozeau; Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.