Literature DB >> 6545727

The control of chiasma distribution.

G H Jones.   

Abstract

The question of recombination control has been the subject of intensive investigation over many years. This paper is restricted to an evaluation of the information obtainable from cytological studies of chiasmata, since other approaches are well represented in other papers in this volume. The advantages and disadvantages of chiasmata as means of studying recombination are discussed. Cytological observations reveal many constraints on the distribution of chiasmata, which are interpreted as outward expressions of controls operating at different levels, namely between cells, between bivalents and within bivalents. Detailed descriptions of these constraints are presented as a preliminary to discussing models and mechanisms of control. They include, at the between-bivalent level, over-dispersal of chiasma number per bivalent and the formation of an obligatory minimum of one chiasma per bivalent; and at the within-bivalent level, chiasma localization and chiasma interference. The genetical basis of these constraints is emphasized and evidence presented which suggests that chiasma distribution at different levels is subject to both separate and coordinate genetical controls. These observations lead to the consideration and evaluation of general stochastic models of chiasma control based on the modification of site probabilities for chiasma formation. While these models are a useful approach to thinking about the control of recombination, they do not give a fully satisfactory explanation of all aspects of chiasma control. Finally, specific mechanisms for chiasma distribution control are considered. In a few exceptional species, localized pairing and synaptonemal complexes lead to localized chiasma formation; details of two such cases are presented. In the majority of species, pairing is not localized or restricted and in these species the control of chiasma distribution is more conjectural. Arguments are presented which suggest that even in these cases of full pairing, the pattern of pairing initiation and progression and perhaps the timing of these events could be important factors controlling the distribution of chiasmata.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6545727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Symp Soc Exp Biol        ISSN: 0081-1386


  88 in total

1.  Patterns of meiotic recombination in human fetal oocytes.

Authors:  Charles Tease; Geraldine M Hartshorne; Maj A Hultén
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Correlation between pairing initiation sites, recombination nodules and meiotic recombination in Sordaria macrospora.

Authors:  D Zickler; P J Moreau; A D Huynh; A M Slezec
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A mechanical basis for chromosome function.

Authors:  Nancy Kleckner; Denise Zickler; Gareth H Jones; Job Dekker; Ruth Padmore; Jim Henle; John Hutchinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Crossovers get a boost in Brassica allotriploid and allotetraploid hybrids.

Authors:  Martine Leflon; Laurie Grandont; Frédérique Eber; Virginie Huteau; Olivier Coriton; Liudmila Chelysheva; Eric Jenczewski; Anne-Marie Chèvre
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 5.  Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity.

Authors:  Neil Hunter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 6.  Regulating double-stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  Frédéric Baudat; Bernard de Massy
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Variation in crossing-over rates across chromosome 4 of Arabidopsis thaliana reveals the presence of meiotic recombination "hot spots".

Authors:  Jan Drouaud; Christine Camilleri; Pierre-Yves Bourguignon; Aurélie Canaguier; Aurélie Bérard; Daniel Vezon; Sandra Giancola; Dominique Brunel; Vincent Colot; Bernard Prum; Hadi Quesneville; Christine Mézard
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination.

Authors:  Esther de Boer; Piet Stam; Axel J J Dietrich; Albert Pastink; Christa Heyting
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Fine-scale crossover rate heterogeneity in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Cirulli; Richard M Kliman; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Rad52 promotes postinvasion steps of meiotic double-strand-break repair.

Authors:  Jessica P Lao; Steve D Oh; Miki Shinohara; Akira Shinohara; Neil Hunter
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.