Literature DB >> 6542501

Differential ratings of perceived exertion and various physiological responses during prolonged upper and lower body exercise.

K B Pandolf, D S Billings, L L Drolet, N A Pimental, M N Sawka.   

Abstract

This study examined whether prolonged exercise employing upper or lower body muscle groups led to significant alterations in three differentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). Multiple regression analyses were used to identify those physiological responses which accounted for the greatest variability in these three RPE. Nine volunteer males performed 60 min of arm crank and cycle exercise at similar absolute and at similar relative exercise intensities. There were no significant differences (P greater than 0.05) between arm and leg exercise for oxygen uptake (VO2) during the absolute tests (approximately 1.60 1 . min-1) or during the relative tests (approximately 60% peak VO2). The RPE included local RPE (muscle and joint exertion), central RPE (ventilatory and circulatory exertion), and overall RPE. During the absolute tests, the final means for all three RPE were lower (P less than 0.05) for leg than arm exercise. No differences (P greater than 0.05) were found during the relative tests between arm and leg exercise for any of the three RPE. Local RPE was generally higher than central RPE. The various physiological responses accounted for more (total) variance in all three RPE for arm than leg exercise (absolute and relative arm exercise: median R2 = 0.99; absolute and relative leg exercise: median R2 = 0.75). Lactate and the ventilatory equivalent of oxygen made the greatest contribution to R2. These data suggest that RPE may be more closely related to relative exercise intensity, and perceptual cues may be more readily monitored from smaller muscle masses such as the upper body. Further, steady-state RPE was not attained during prolonged upper body exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6542501     DOI: 10.1007/bf00964681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  24 in total

1.  Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion during physical conditioning of older individuals using leg-weight loading.

Authors:  K B Pandolf; R L Burse; R F Goldman
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1975-04

2.  Perceived exertion associated with breathing hyperoxic mixtures during submaximal work.

Authors:  P D Allen; K B Pandolf
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1977

3.  Perceived exertion during rhythmic exercise involving different muscle masses.

Authors:  A J Sargeant; C T Davies
Journal:  J Hum Ergol (Tokyo)       Date:  1973-09

4.  Physiological correlates of perceived exertion in continuous and intermittent exercise with the same average power output.

Authors:  R H Edwards; A Melcher; C M Hesser; O Wigertz; L G Ekelund
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 4.686

5.  Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1970

6.  Differentiated perceptions of exertion: part II. relationship to local and central physiological responses.

Authors:  R J Robertson; R L Gillespie; J McCarthy; K D Rose
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1979-12

7.  Determination of maximal aerobic power during upper-body exercise.

Authors:  M N Sawka; M E Foley; N A Pimental; M M Toner; K B Pandolf
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1983-01

8.  Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion are influenced by high altitude exposure.

Authors:  A J Young; A Cymerman; K B Pandolf
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 9.  Sensory cues for perceived exertion: a review.

Authors:  P M Mihevic
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion during physical exercise.

Authors:  K B Pandolf
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  11 in total

1.  Perceived exertion as a tool to self-regulate exercise in individuals with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Thomas A W Paulson; Nicolette C Bishop; Christof A Leicht; Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Functional Fatigue Decreases 3-Dimensional Multijoint Position Reproduction Acuity in the Overhead-Throwing Athlete.

Authors:  Brady L Tripp; Lanny Boswell; Bruce M Gansneder; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Responses to arm and leg ergometry.

Authors:  R G Eston; D A Brodie
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 4.  Rating of Perceived Effort: Methodological Concerns and Future Directions.

Authors:  Israel Halperin; Aviv Emanuel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Perceived exertion. Antecedents and applications.

Authors:  B Watt; R Grove
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Influence of lifting technique on perceptual and cardiovascular responses to submaximal repetitive lifting.

Authors:  K B Hagen; K Harms-Ringdahl; J Hallén
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

7.  Elasticity changes in the large arteries of human limbs in response to cycle ergometry performed with upper and lower limbs.

Authors:  B I Mazhbich; M D Roifman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

8.  Interval training elicits higher enjoyment versus moderate exercise in persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Todd A Astorino; Jacob S Thum
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Effect of Height on Perceived Exertion and Physiological Responses for Climbers of Differing Ability Levels.

Authors:  Jan Gajdošík; Jiří Baláš; Nick Draper
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-06-05

10.  Exercise intensity-dependent effects of arm and leg-cycling on cognitive performance.

Authors:  Mathew Hill; Steven Walsh; Christopher Talbot; Michael Price; Michael Duncan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.