Literature DB >> 530773

Differentiated perceptions of exertion: part II. relationship to local and central physiological responses.

R J Robertson, R L Gillespie, J McCarthy, K D Rose.   

Abstract

Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion in the legs and chest were compared to local and central physiological adjustments during submaximal cycle ergometer exercise. 50 male subjects performed three separate cycle ergometer tests. Power output was held constant at 840 kpm/min., while pedalling rate was randomly set at 40, 60, or 80 rpm. Differentiated reports of exertion from the legs were considered to be local signals and reports from the chest to be central signals. Ratings of exertion for the legs, chest and over-all body were each significantly higher at 40 rpm than 60 or 80 rpm. Heart rate, oxygen uptake, ventilation and respiratory rate were also higher at 40 rpm. Lactic acid, pH, and pCO2 were similar between pedalling rates. Lactic acid did not operate differentially to influence local perceptual signals from the legs. Central measures of respiratory and aerobic metabolic adjustments were consistent with the more intense regional report of chest exertion at 40 rpm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 530773     DOI: 10.2466/pms.1979.49.3.691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  11 in total

1.  Effect of exercise intensity on differentiated and undifferentiated ratings of perceived exertion during cycle and treadmill exercise in recreationally active and trained women.

Authors:  Melinda R Bolgar; Carol E Baker; Fredric L Goss; Elizabeth Nagle; Robert J Robertson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Perceived exertion and blood lactate concentration during graded treadmill running.

Authors:  F W Kolkhorst; S W Mittelstadt; F A Dolgener
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

3.  Cross-validation of Peak Oxygen Consumption Prediction Models From OMNI Perceived Exertion.

Authors:  R J Mays; F L Goss; E F Nagle; M Gallagher; L Haile; M A Schafer; K H Kim; R J Robertson
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.118

4.  Ratings of perceived exertion in individuals with varying fitness levels during walking and running.

Authors:  M J Berry; A S Weyrich; R A Robergs; K M Krause; C P Ingalls
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

5.  Effect of training on the rating of perceived exertion at the ventilatory threshold.

Authors:  D W Hill; K J Cureton; S C Grisham; M A Collins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1987

Review 6.  A critical review of the literature on ratings scales for perceived exertion.

Authors:  R L Carton; E C Rhodes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Contribution of differentiated ratings of perceived exertion to overall exertion in women while swimming.

Authors:  T Ueda; T Kurokawa; K Kikkawa; T H Choi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993

Review 8.  Perceived exertion. Antecedents and applications.

Authors:  B Watt; R Grove
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Differential ratings of perceived exertion and various physiological responses during prolonged upper and lower body exercise.

Authors:  K B Pandolf; D S Billings; L L Drolet; N A Pimental; M N Sawka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1984

10.  Differentiated perceptions of exertion and energy cost of young women while carrying loads.

Authors:  R J Robertson; C J Caspersen; T G Allison; G S Skrinar; R A Abbott; K F Metz
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1982
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.