Literature DB >> 6541591

Response of C3H/10T1/2 fibroblasts to an external steady electric field stimulation. Reorientation, shape change, ConA receptor and intramembranous particle distribution and cytoskeleton reorganization.

W P Yang, E K Onuma, S W Hui.   

Abstract

C3H/10T1/2 mouse embryo fibroblasts were stimulated by a steady electric field ranging up to 15 V/cm. The percentage of spindle-shaped cells increased with the field strength and duration of the stimulation. These cells oriented preferentially with their long axis perpendicular to the field direction. A small percentage of the cells were found to move slightly toward the cathode during the course of electric stimulation. Although no apparent field-induced redistribution of fluorescent-labelled concanavalin A (conA) receptor along the cell periphery was observed, the bright perinuclear area appeared preferentially on the anode side. Correlative fluorescence and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed no difference in the density of conA-gold microsphere labels on either side of the cell. The density of intramembranous particles on the E-face of the plasma membrane was 54% higher on the anode side than on the cathode side of the cell. The microfilament bundles were observed to be disrupted after 30 min of 10 V/cm stimulation by rhodamine phalloidin labelling of F-actin. The cell sensitivity to electric field-induced reorientation and cell shape changes was reduced by pretreatment with conA, and to a lesser extent, with succinyl conA or wheat germ agglutinin (WGA). ConA pretreatment alone also reduced the prominence of microfilament bundles. However, post-field lectin binding to the cell has no effect on cell recovery. It is possible that the generally flat 10T1/2 cells retract and realign in order to minimize the disruption of their membrane potential. The conA binding-mediated receptor-cytoskeletal linkage temporarily immobilizes the cell and inhibits subsequent field-induced shape changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6541591     DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(84)90770-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Cell Res        ISSN: 0014-4827            Impact factor:   3.905


  9 in total

1.  In vitro electrical-stimulated wound-healing chip for studying electric field-assisted wound-healing process.

Authors:  Yung-Shin Sun; Shih-Wei Peng; Ji-Yen Cheng
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 2.  High-Voltage Pulsed Current Electrical Stimulation in Wound Treatment.

Authors:  Anna Polak; Andrzej Franek; Jakub Taradaj
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Pulsed electric field mediated in vitro cellular response of fibroblast and osteoblast-like cells on conducting austenitic stainless steel substrate.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar Dubey; Parnika Agrawal; R Devesh Kumar Misra; Bikramjit Basu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Harnessing the Electric Spark of Life to Cure Skin Wounds.

Authors:  Cristina Martin-Granados; Colin D McCaig
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  High-voltage electrical stimulation for the management of stage III and IV pressure ulcers among adults with spinal cord injury: demonstration of its utility for recalcitrant wounds below the level of injury.

Authors:  Albert C Recio; Cara E Felter; Anna Corrine Schneider; John W McDonald
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  DC electric stimulation upregulates angiogenic factors in endothelial cells through activation of VEGF receptors.

Authors:  Huai Bai; John V Forrester; Min Zhao
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.861

7.  Electric field-directed cell shape changes, displacement, and cytoskeletal reorganization are calcium dependent.

Authors:  E K Onuma; S W Hui
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Effects of electrical biostimulation and silver ions on porcine fibroblast cells.

Authors:  Yuanfeng Zhao; Thomas D Bunch; S Clay Isom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Improvement of human keratinocyte migration by a redox active bioelectric dressing.

Authors:  Jaideep Banerjee; Piya Das Ghatak; Sashwati Roy; Savita Khanna; Emily K Sequin; Karen Bellman; Bryan C Dickinson; Prerna Suri; Vish V Subramaniam; Christopher J Chang; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.