Literature DB >> 6540198

The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. IV. Updating of ongoing isometric responses.

D S Vicario, C Ghez.   

Abstract

In cats trained to track a moving display by making rapid, isometric force adjustments, responses are characterized by extremely short reaction times (60-70 ms) and a stereotyped temporal configuration. The animal uses early derivatives of display movement to scale force responses to target stimuli of different sizes according to a learned relationship between initial display motion and required force (Ghez and Vicario 1978a, 1978b). In the present study we altered that relationship by using double stimulation and delayed feedback to assess the animals' ability to update their responses. In experiments where a second target stimulus followed the first after a controlled interval (15-120 ms) on random trials, the animal modified its response in the appropriate direction with little or no increase in reaction time. When the second stimulus called for a return to baseline, the animal aborted the ongoing response. When the second stimulus called for a doubling of force, the animal increased its phasic force output; however, this increase was not sufficient to reach the new target level and late responses were emitted. The control response which followed each experimental double stimulation trial showed consistent differences from other controls in the amplitude of both peak force and peak dF/dt. Control responses following trials calling for a return were reduced in size; those following stimuli requiring response doubling were increased. We concluded that the experimental trials not only elicited modification of ongoing responses but also caused the animal to alter its internalized gain function relating initial display derivatives to required force. In experiments where feedback was delayed after giving a first target stimulus such that the compensatory display failed to reflect the animal's initial response, the animal emitted a new updated response 70-80 ms after the first. The display trajectory which caused the cat to update its response on delayed feedback trial was identical to that of control trials with long reaction times. In this case, however, the information eliciting response updating had to be derived as a difference between the actual display trajectory and that expected by the animal, based on its experience with the tracking task. This suggests that the animal develops an internal model of display properties which is used to determine when a new response is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6540198     DOI: 10.1007/bf00240507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  Correlation of neural discharge with pattern and force of muscular activity, joint position, and direction of intended next movement in motor cortex and cerebellum.

Authors:  W T Thach
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Possible modification to a rapid on-going programmed manual response.

Authors:  E D Megaw
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-05-17       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Sampling or intermittency in hand control system dynamics.

Authors:  F Navas; L Stark
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Single cell studies of the primate putamen. II. Relations to direction of movement and pattern of muscular activity.

Authors:  M D Crutcher; M R DeLong
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location.

Authors:  J F Soechting; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Synaptic organization of cat accessory abducens nucleus.

Authors:  R Baker; R A McCrea; R F Spencer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Oculomotor unit behavior in the monkey.

Authors:  D A Robinson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The effect of superseding signals.

Authors:  R Gottsdanker
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Time taken to change the speed of a response.

Authors:  M A Vince; A T Welford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-02-04       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. II. Scaling of isometric force adjustments.

Authors:  C Ghez; D Vicario
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1978-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  11 in total

1.  Rapid correction of aimed movements by summation of force-field primitives.

Authors:  W J Kargo; S F Giszter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Temporal evolution of oscillatory activity predicts performance in a choice-reaction time reaching task.

Authors:  Bernardo Perfetti; Clara Moisello; Eric C Landsness; Svetlana Kvint; April Pruski; Marco Onofrj; Giulio Tononi; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. I. Changes in load force amplitude.

Authors:  R S Johansson; R Riso; C Häger; L Bäckström
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cognitive spatial-motor processes. 4. Specification of the direction of visually guided isometric forces in two-dimensional space: information transmitted and effects of visual force-feedback.

Authors:  J T Massey; R A Drake; J T Lurito; A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Prehension in the pigeon. II. Kinematic analysis.

Authors:  R Bermejo; H P Zeigler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. II. Pulse height control.

Authors:  J Gordon; C Ghez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Friction at the digit-object interface scales the sensorimotor transformation for grip responses to pulling loads.

Authors:  K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The force constraint strategy for stance is independent of prior experience.

Authors:  J M Macpherson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. III. Compensatory adjustments for initial errors.

Authors:  J Gordon; C Ghez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Sequential processes for controlling distance in multijoint movements.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.