Literature DB >> 5639937

Sampling or intermittency in hand control system dynamics.

F Navas, L Stark.   

Abstract

A hand control model is proposed. Investigation of the hand's intermittency synchronization shows it corresponds to an input-synchronized sampler rather than the clock-synchronized sampler more typical of engineering systems. A velocity control mechanism, similar to that in an eye tracking system is shown to be absent in the hand. A quantitative transfer function for predictable inputs serves further to define the hand's input adaptive characteristics. Stability margin adjustments of a linear reduced model enabled us to match the available quantitative data. The most exciting result of this study is the evidence for intermittency: a refractory period shown in the short pulse experiment, peaks in the frequency response experiments, and a saccadic sequence of steps in response to an open loop step input and to a closed loop ramp input.

Mesh:

Year:  1968        PMID: 5639937      PMCID: PMC1367375          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(68)86488-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  1 in total

1.  Dynamic Characteristics of the Motor Coordination System in Man.

Authors:  L Stark; M Iida; P A Willis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1961-03       Impact factor: 4.033

  1 in total
  40 in total

1.  Common modulation of motor unit pairs during slow wrist movement in man.

Authors:  N Kakuda; M Nagaoka; J Wessberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Common 3 and 10 Hz oscillations modulate human eye and finger movements while they simultaneously track a visual target.

Authors:  J H McAuley; S F Farmer; J C Rothwell; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Anticipatory control of hand and eye movements in humans during oculo-manual tracking.

Authors:  G R Barnes; J F Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Human control of an inverted pendulum: is continuous control necessary? Is intermittent control effective? Is intermittent control physiological?

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Henrik Gollee; Martin Lakie; Peter J Gawthrop
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Visual control of stable and unstable loads: what is the feedback delay and extent of linear time-invariant control?

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Martin Lakie; Peter J Gawthrop
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Distinct and flexible rates of online control.

Authors:  John de Grosbois; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-21

7.  Corrective jitter motion shows similar individual frequencies for the arm and the finger.

Authors:  Lior Noy; Uri Alon; Jason Friedman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Oculo-manual tracking of visual targets in monkey: role of the arm afferent information in the control of arm and eye movements.

Authors:  G M Gauthier; F Mussa Ivaldi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Force-field compensation in a manual tracking task.

Authors:  Valentina Squeri; Lorenzo Masia; Maura Casadio; Pietro Morasso; Elena Vergaro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Organization of motor output in slow finger movements in man.

Authors:  A B Vallbo; J Wessberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.