Literature DB >> 6530228

Comparison of prometaphase chromosome techniques with emphasis on the role of colcemid.

J E Wiley, L M Sargent, S L Inhorn, L F Meisner.   

Abstract

Six different techniques were evaluated to define better those technical factors that are most critical for obtaining prometaphase cells for banding analysis. Our results demonstrate: colcemid exposures of 30 min or less have no effect on increasing the yield of prometaphase cells, colcemid exposures of greater than 0.1 microgram/ml can be toxic, methotrexate depresses the mitotic index significantly and seems to increase the incidence of prometaphase cells only because it suppresses later forms; and (d) the optimum number of cytogenetically satisfactory prometaphase cells can be obtained with a 4-h exposure to a combination of low concentration actinomycin D (0.5 microgram/ml) and colcemid (0.1 microgram/ml). This technique inhibits chromosome condensation while permitting prometaphase cells to accumulate for 4 h.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6530228     DOI: 10.1007/bf02619667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vitro        ISSN: 0073-5655


  11 in total

1.  Structure of chromosomes. I. Morphological studies of the spiral structure of human somatic chromosomes.

Authors:  Y Ohnuki
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  The interaction of 7-substituted actinomycin D analogs with DNA.

Authors:  S K Sengupta; D Schaer
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1978-11-21

3.  A simple technique for obtaining prometaphase chromosomes from lymphocytes.

Authors:  J V Shah; R S Verma; J Rodriguez; H Dosik
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  High-resolution cytogenetics.

Authors:  J J Yunis; R C Lewandowski
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1983

5.  Chromosomal effects of methotrexate on cultured human lymphocytes.

Authors:  C Mondello; R Giorgi; F Nuzzo
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  A simple, rapid, high-resolution chromosome technic for lymphocytes.

Authors:  Y S Kao; J Whang-Peng; E Lee
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Loss of mitotic centrosomal microtubule initiation capacity at the metaphase-anaphase transition.

Authors:  J A Snyder; B T Hamilton; J M Mullins
Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  A simple reproducible method for prometaphase chromosome analysis.

Authors:  J Rybak; A Tharapel; S Robinett; M Garcia; C Mankinen; M Freeman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Effect of controlled colcemid exposure on human metaphase chromosome structure.

Authors:  M Rønne; K Vang Nielsen; M Erlandsen
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  The characterization of high-resolution G-banded chromosomes of man.

Authors:  J J Yunis; J R Sawyer; D W Ball
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1978-08-14       Impact factor: 4.316

View more
  3 in total

1.  Genotoxicity of carbon nanofibers: are they potentially more or less dangerous than carbon nanotubes or asbestos?

Authors:  E R Kisin; A R Murray; L Sargent; D Lowry; M Chirila; K J Siegrist; D Schwegler-Berry; S Leonard; V Castranova; B Fadeel; V E Kagan; A A Shvedova
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  A new diploid nontumorigenic human breast epithelial cell line isolated and propagated in chemically defined medium.

Authors:  P Briand; O W Petersen; B Van Deurs
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1987-03

3.  CCAR2 controls mitotic progression through spatiotemporal regulation of Aurora B.

Authors:  Jaewook Ryu; Ja-Eun Kim
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 9.685

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.