Literature DB >> 652480

Orientation-selective inhibition and binocular rivalry.

P Walker.   

Abstract

It is hypothesized that a negative correlation exists between the readiness with which two visual stimuli display rivalry and the magnitude of the inhibition effects between the corresponding neural channels. With binocular rivalry being more readily observed than monocular rivalry, it is predicted that lateral inhibition between neural channels selectively sensitive to such fundamental parameters as orientation, is primarily confined to those monocularly driven channels deriving their sensory input from the same eye. In confirmation, it is shown that the visual tilt illusion, thought to reflect lateral inhibition between orientation-sensitive channels, is very much reduced under dichoptic viewing conditions. Moreover, it is shown that those subjects displaying the greatest interocular transfer of the illusion least readily experience binocular rivalry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 652480     DOI: 10.1068/p070207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  4 in total

1.  Brain mechanisms for simple perception and bistable perception.

Authors:  Megan Wang; Daniel Arteaga; Biyu J He
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stereopsis and binocular rivalry are based on perceived rather than physical orientations.

Authors:  Adrien Chopin; Pascal Mamassian; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Some comments on Thomas' (1977) reciprocal inhibitory model for monocular rivalry.

Authors:  P Walker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-06

4.  High-level binocular rivalry effects.

Authors:  Michal Wolf; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.