Literature DB >> 22609083

Stereopsis and binocular rivalry are based on perceived rather than physical orientations.

Adrien Chopin1, Pascal Mamassian, Randolph Blake.   

Abstract

Binocular rivalry is an intriguing phenomenon: when different images are displayed to the two eyes, perception alternates between these two images. What determines whether two monocular images engage in fusion or in rivalry: the physical difference between these images or the difference between the percepts resulting from the images? We investigated that question by measuring the interocular difference of grid orientation needed to produce a transition from fusion to rivalry and by changing those transitions by means of a superimposed tilt illusion. Fusion was attested by a correct stereoscopic slant perception of the grid. The superimposed tilt illusion was achieved in displaying small segments on the grids. We found that the illusion can change the fusion-rivalry transitions indicating that rivalry and fusion are based on the perceived orientations rather than the displayed ones. In a second experiment, we confirmed that the absence of binocular rivalry resulted in fusion and stereoscopic slant perception. We conclude that the superimposed tilt illusion arises at a level of visual processing prior to those stages mediating binocular rivalry and stereoscopic depth extraction.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22609083      PMCID: PMC3377766          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  31 in total

1.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Stereopsis produced without horizontally disparate stimulus loci.

Authors:  P C SQUIRES
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

3.  Hysteresis effects in stereopsis and binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Athena Buckthought; Jeounghoon Kim; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Color in complex scenes.

Authors:  Steven K Shevell; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Spatial filtering and spatial primitives in early vision: an explanation of the Zöllner-Judd class of geometrical illusion.

Authors:  M J Morgan; C Casco
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1990-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Orientation disparity, deformation, and stereoscopic slant perception.

Authors:  B Gillam; B Rogers
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Orientation-specific relationship between populations of excitatory and inhibitory lateral connections in the visual cortex of the cat.

Authors:  Z F Kisvárday; E Tóth; M Rausch; U T Eysel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1997 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

10.  Orientation selectivity and the arrangement of horizontal connections in tree shrew striate cortex.

Authors:  W H Bosking; Y Zhang; B Schofield; D Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

1.  Grouping ambiguous neural representations: neither identical chromaticity (the stimulus) nor color (the percept) is necessary.

Authors:  Emily Slezak; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.