Literature DB >> 6521469

Masked and unmasked pure-tone thresholds of infants and adults: development of auditory frequency selectivity and sensitivity.

R J Nozza, W R Wilson.   

Abstract

Detection thresholds for pure tones (1000 Hz and 4000 Hz) in noise and in quiet were estimated for infants at 6 months and 12 months of age and for adults. A visually reinforced head-turn procedure under control of a PDP-11/03 minicomputer was used. An adaptive protocol with a 5-dB step size was employed for the threshold estimates. Infant thresholds were poorer than adult thresholds in each condition. In noise, infant-adult differences were 8 dB (6-month-old infants) and 6 dB (12-month-old infants) at each frequency. In quiet, infant-adult differences were 14 dB (6-month-old infants) and 12 dB (12-month-old infants) at 1000 Hz but were only 7 dB (6-month-old infants) and 5 dB (12-month-old infants) at 4000 Hz. The masking data suggest that infants are at only a slight disadvantage in detecting a target in a background of noise and are consistent with a frequency selectivity mechanism that is proportional to that of adults. The detection-in-quiet data, with greater correspondence among the groups at 4000 Hz than at 1000 Hz, support the notion that hearing sensitivity varies with frequency in a different way in infants than in adults. Data on task performance reveal significant age effects, and the possibility that such effects have biased the observed differences in the estimates of sensory function among the groups is considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6521469     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2704.613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  19 in total

1.  Effects of Self-Generated Noise on Estimates of Detection Threshold in Quiet for School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Infants use onset asynchrony cues in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Assessment: scientific foundation.

Authors:  R J Nozza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-06

4.  The audiologic assessment of the young pediatric patient: the clinic.

Authors:  D L Sabo
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-06

5.  Auditory System Development and Dysfunction: What Do We Really Know about Childhood Hearing Loss?

Authors:  A E Carney
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-06

6.  Sensitivity to major versus minor musical modes is bimodally distributed in young infants.

Authors:  Scott A Adler; Kyle J Comishen; Audrey M B Wong-Kee-You; Charles Chubb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Rodent auditory perception: Critical band limitations and plasticity.

Authors:  J King; M Insanally; M Jin; A R O Martins; J A D'amour; R C Froemke
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  The cocktail party effect in infants.

Authors:  R S Newman; P W Jusczyk
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-11

9.  Sources of auditory masking in infants: distraction effects.

Authors:  L A Werner; J Y Bargones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-11

10.  Infants' use of isolated and combined temporal cues in speech sound segregation.

Authors:  Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.