Literature DB >> 6514157

Composite autogeneic human cranioplasty: frozen skull supplemented with fresh iliac corticocancellous bone.

D J Prolo, S A Oklund.   

Abstract

Skull totally exteriorized during craniotomy becomes nonviable. Resorption of the reimplanted cranial section occurs variably according to its treatment, the properties of the recipient bed, and the metabolic conditions of the host. Neurosurgeons commonly deep freeze autogeneic skull for preservation before delayed autogeneic cranioplasty. Aseptic necrosis commonly follows replacement of the autograft in its former cranial bed. This clinical study of six patients represents an attempt to block this destructive resorption by supplementing the frozen autograft with fresh corticocancellous autogeneic ilium. Observations of these patients ranging in age from 12 to 52 years support the following conclusions: (a) Osteogenesis was not enhanced by the addition of fresh corticocancellous bone to the frozen autoimplant. (b) The period of time that the autoimplant was frozen did not influence its subsequent biological behavior after cranioplasty. (c) Sterilization with ethylene oxide and in one case additional gamma irradiation did not impair the quality of the implant compared to those not sterilized. (d) Resorption occurred in both frozen and fresh but devitalized autogeneic skull. (e) Autogeneic skull is repaired by osteoconduction rather than by inducing competent perivascular stem cells to become osteogenic. (f) Freezing of autogeneic skull for preservation is practical, acceptable, but suboptimal from the perspectives of cerebral protection and cosmetic reconstruction. (g) The supplementation of the frozen autoimplant with fresh corticocancellous bone increases operating time and patient discomfort without affording additional benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6514157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  8 in total

1.  Cranioplasty with a frozen and autoclaved bone flap.

Authors:  M Osawa; H Hara; Y Ichinose; T Koyama; S Kobayashi; Y Sugita
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Bone transplantation.

Authors:  L Schweiberer; H Stützle; H K Mandelkow
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Craniofacial Prosthetic Reconstruction Using Polymethyl Methacrylate Implant: A Case Report.

Authors:  Paul Simon; Jayashree Mohan; Sunantha Selvaraj; B S Saravanan; Parikodaiarasan Pari
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-04-22

4.  Cranioplasty with an autoclaved bone flap, with special reference to tumour infiltration of the flap.

Authors:  K Wester
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Resorption of Autogenous Bone Graft in Cranioplasty: Resorption and Reintegration Failure.

Authors:  Si Hoon Lee; Chan Jong Yoo; Uhn Lee; Cheol Wan Park; Sang Gu Lee; Woo Kyung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-04-30

6.  Bone Flap Changes after Cranioplasty Using Frozen Autologous Bone Flaps: A Three-Dimensional Volumetric Reconstruction Study.

Authors:  Jung Hwan Lee; Chung Kee Chough; Hyuk Jin Choi; Jun Kyeung Ko; Won Ho Cho; Seung Heon Cha; Chang Hwa Choi; Young Ha Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Salvage of an exposed cranial prosthetic implant using a transposition flap with an indwelling antibiotic irrigation system.

Authors:  Sung Oh Hwang; Lan Sook Chang
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2020-02-20

Review 8.  Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Surface Fabrication for Innovative Cranial and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Simona Cavalu; Iulian Vasile Antoniac; Aurel Mohan; Florian Bodog; Cristian Doicin; Ileana Mates; Mihaela Ulmeanu; Roman Murzac; Augustin Semenescu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.