Literature DB >> 7754825

Cranioplasty with an autoclaved bone flap, with special reference to tumour infiltration of the flap.

K Wester1.   

Abstract

The results of a total of 25 cranioplasties are reported. In 10 patients, a reinforced acrylic prosthesis was utilized. In the remaining 15 cases, the patient's own autoclaved bone flap was re-implanted. Six of these bone flaps were autoclaved to kill tumour cells, and was re-implanted during the same surgical procedure. In the remaining 9 patients, the flaps were removed to allow brain swelling, preserved in a freezer and re-implanted several months later. All the prostheses and re-implanted flaps were accepted by the patients without complications such as infections or resorption, and with cosmetically satisfying results. The tumour infiltrated flaps remained tumour free for the entire period of observation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7754825     DOI: 10.1007/BF01808617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  12 in total

1.  Use of frozen cranial bone flaps for autogenous and homologous grafts in cranioplasty and spinal interbody fusion.

Authors:  K H ABBOTT
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1953-07       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Bone flap replacement vs acrylic cranioplasty: a clinical audit.

Authors:  T Z Aziz; B G Mathew; P J Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.596

3.  The bone-bank in neurosurgery.

Authors:  H ELLIOTT; H J SCOTT
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1951-07       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The replacement of free bone plates in routine craniotomies.

Authors:  B S RAY; H PARSONS
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1947-07       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Cranioplasty with a frozen and autoclaved bone flap.

Authors:  M Osawa; H Hara; Y Ichinose; T Koyama; S Kobayashi; Y Sugita
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Titanium mesh and acrylic cranioplasty.

Authors:  L I Malis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Autogeneic skull bone grafts to reconstruct large or complex skull defects in children and adolescents.

Authors:  M S Edwards; D K Ousterhout
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  THE RESTORATION OF DEFECTS IN THE SKULL: WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE MANAGEMENT OF INTRINSIC TUMORS OF THE SKULL AND CERTAIN TYPES OF LOCALIZED OSTEOMYELITIS.

Authors:  H C Naffziger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1936-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Management of extensive and difficult cranial defects.

Authors:  B Guyuron; M Shafron; B Columbi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Cranial defects repair by replacing bone flaps.

Authors:  F M Crotti; E P Mangiagalli
Journal:  J Neurosurg Sci       Date:  1979 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  2 in total

1.  Stereolithography for posterior fossa cranioplasty.

Authors:  C Agner; M Dujovny; R Evenhouse; F T Charbel; L Sadler
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1998

2.  Intraoperative Extracorporeal Irradiation for the Treatment of the Meningioma-Infiltrated Calvarium.

Authors:  Edward E Kerr; Ruben Fragoso; Rudolph J Schrot; Kiarash Shahlaie
Journal:  J Neurol Surg Rep       Date:  2015-06-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.