Literature DB >> 6510560

The readability of health-care literature.

A Nicoll, C Harrison.   

Abstract

The readability of health-related pamphlets intended for the British public was compared with that of English national newspapers. Many of the pamphlets were found to be less readable than desirable. Pamphlets issued by government departments (principally the Department of Health and Social Security) were assessed as particularly difficult to read, but some specialist and commercially produced pamphlets also gave cause for concern. A small number of specially produced 'baby books' were found to have more suitable levels of prose difficulty. It is suggested that readability formulae can be a useful tool in the initial assessment of health education literature.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6510560     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1984.tb04497.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol        ISSN: 0012-1622            Impact factor:   5.449


  4 in total

1.  Journal notes.

Authors:  W K Beatty
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1986-01

2.  Computer-tailored smoking cessation advice matched to reading ability: Perceptions of participants from the ESCAPE trial.

Authors:  Kirsty Bennett; Hazel Gilbert; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-06-25

3.  Prescription painkillers and controlled substances: an appraisal of drug information provided by six US pharmacies.

Authors:  Preetinder S Gill
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2013-02-25

4.  Readability assessment of concussion and traumatic brain injury publications by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors:  Preetinder S Gill; Tejkaran S Gill; Ashwini Kamath; Billy Whisnant
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2012-11-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.