Literature DB >> 6506686

Magnetic resonance imaging. Part I--physical principles.

W R Hendee, C J Morgan.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most complex imaging technology available to clinicians. Whereas most imaging technologies depict differences in one, or occasionally two, tissue characteristics, MR imaging has five tissue variables-spin density, T(1) and T(2) relaxation times and flow and spectral shifts-from which to construct its images. These variables can be combined in various ways by selecting pulse sequences and pulse times to emphasize any desired combination of tissue characteristics in the image. This selection is determined by the user of the MR system before imaging data are collected. If the selection is not optimal, the imaging process must be repeated at a cost of time and resources. The optimal selection of MR imaging procedures and the proper interpretation of the resultant images require a thorough understanding of the basic principles of MR imaging. Included in this understanding should be at least the rudiments of how an MR imaging signal is produced and why it decays with time; the significance of relaxation constants; the principles of scanning methods such as saturation recovery, inversion recovery and spin echo; how data obtained by these methods are used to form an image, and how the imaging data are complied by multi-slice and volumetric processes. In selecting an MR imaging unit, information about different magnet designs (resistive, superconductive and permanent) is useful. Although no bioeffects are thought to be associated with an MR imaging examination, some knowledge of the attempts to identify bioeffects is helpful in alleviating concern in patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6506686      PMCID: PMC1021860     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  7 in total

1.  Magnetic anisotropy and the orientation of retinal rods in a homogeneous magnetic field.

Authors:  F T Hong; D Mauzerall; A Mauro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Medical imaging by NMR.

Authors:  P Mansfield; A A Maudsley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Summary of cardiac fibrillation thresholds for 60 Hz currents and voltages applied directly to the heart.

Authors:  O Z Roy
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Potential hazards in NMR imaging: heating effects of changing magnetic fields and RF fields on small metallic implants.

Authors:  P L Davis; L Crooks; M Arakawa; R McRee; L Kaufman; A R Margulis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  The effects of NMR exposure on living organisms. II. A genetic study of human lymphocytes.

Authors:  P Cooke; P G Morris
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Thermal aspects of electromagnetic field interactions with bound calcium ions at the nerve cell surface.

Authors:  T S Tenforde
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1980-04-07       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  P F New; B R Rosen; T J Brady; F S Buonanno; J P Kistler; C T Burt; W S Hinshaw; J H Newhouse; G M Pohost; J M Taveras
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 11.105

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Detection of the spatial accuracy of a magnetic resonance and surgical computed tomography scanner in the region of surgical interest.

Authors:  Tapani Koivukangas; Jani Katisko; John Koivukangas
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-04-23

2.  Ultrashort echo time T2 values decrease in tendons with application of static tensile loads.

Authors:  Saeed Jerban; Amin Nazaran; Xin Cheng; Michael Carl; Nikolaus Szeverenyi; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging. Part II--Clinical applications.

Authors:  W R Hendee; C J Morgan
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1984-11

Review 4.  Basic principles of magnetic resonance imaging--an update.

Authors:  A L Scherzinger; W R Hendee
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-12

5.  Collagen proton fraction from ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) MRI modelling correlates significantly with cortical bone porosity measured with micro-computed tomography (μCT).

Authors:  Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Lidi Wan; Adam C Searleman; Hyungseok Jang; Robert L Sah; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 6.  Structural, metabolic, and functional brain abnormalities as a result of prenatal exposure to drugs of abuse: evidence from neuroimaging.

Authors:  Florence Roussotte; Lindsay Soderberg; Elizabeth Sowell
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  A robust and accurate center-frequency estimation (RACE) algorithm for improving motion estimation performance of SinMod on tagged cardiac MR images without known tagging parameters.

Authors:  Hong Liu; Jie Wang; Xiangyang Xu; Enmin Song; Qian Wang; Renchao Jin; Chih-Cheng Hung; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Dual-function theranostic nanoparticles for drug delivery and medical imaging contrast: perspectives and challenges for use in lung diseases.

Authors:  M Howell; C Wang; A Mahmoud; G Hellermann; S S Mohapatra; S Mohapatra
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.617

9.  Application and preventive maintenance of neurology medical equipment in isfahan alzahra hospital.

Authors:  Parivash Alikhani; Sahar Vesal; Parviz Kashefi; Ramin Etamadi Pour; Fariborz Khorvash; Gholamreza Askari; Rokhsareh Meamar
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-05

Review 10.  Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and therapy of cancer.

Authors:  Reju Thomas; In-Kyu Park; Yong Yeon Jeong
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.