Literature DB >> 6502643

Dignity and cost-effectiveness: a rejection of the utilitarian approach to death.

S A Brooks.   

Abstract

Utilitarianism is commonly assumed to be the most appropriate sub-structure for medical ethics. This view is challenged. It is suggested that the utilitarian approach to euthanasia works against the patient's individual advantage and is a corrupting influence in the relationship between the physician and society. Dignity for the individual patient is not easily achieved by assessing that person's worth against the yardstick of others' needs and wishes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Death and Euthanasia; Philosophical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6502643      PMCID: PMC1374984          DOI: 10.1136/jme.10.3.148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  6 in total

1.  Ethical dilemmas of brain failure in the elderly.

Authors:  G S Robertson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-12-10

2.  Symposium: 3. Legislation is likely to create more difficulties than it resolves.

Authors:  J Havard
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Debate: extraordinary means and the sanctity of life.

Authors:  H Kuhse
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Dealing with the brain-damaged old--dignity before sanctity.

Authors:  G S Robertson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Medical ethics: some reservations.

Authors:  J D Swales
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Ethical problems in the management of some severely handicapped children.

Authors:  J Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.903

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Utilitarianism.

Authors:  R Gillon
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-05-11

2.  Utilitarianism.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Dignity and death: a reply.

Authors:  S A Brooks
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.903

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.