Literature DB >> 4009639

Dignity and death: a reply.

S A Brooks.   

Abstract

Some form of utilitarian approach can be discerned as underlying much current medical ethical decision-making. Criticisms of the practical effects of such an approach are not parried by asserting the fundamental strengths of utilitarianism as theory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Death and Euthanasia; Journal of Medical Ethics; Philosophical Approach

Mesh：

Year:  1985        PMID： 4009639      PMCID： PMC1375152          DOI： 10.1136/jme.11.2.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN： 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  8 in total

1.  Why you don't owe it to yourself to seek health.

Authors:  S Gorovitz
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Arresting but misleading phrases.

Authors:  J Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The positive aspects of medical ethics today.

Authors:  K Boyd
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Symposium: 3. Legislation is likely to create more difficulties than it resolves.

Authors:  J Havard
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Dealing with the brain-damaged old--dignity before sanctity.

Authors:  G S Robertson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Medical ethics: some reservations.

Authors:  J D Swales
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Dignity and cost-effectiveness: a rejection of the utilitarian approach to death.

Authors:  S A Brooks
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Dignity and cost-effectiveness: analysing the responsibility for decisions in medical ethics.

Authors:  G S Robertson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.903
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.