Literature DB >> 6501114

The auditory neurophonic: basic properties.

R L Snyder, C E Schreiner.   

Abstract

In anesthetized cats an AC signal or neurophonic can be recorded from the auditory nerve and from the scalp when the cochlea is stimulated with low frequency tones. This study examines some of the basic properties of the auditory neurophonics. The auditory nerve signal, termed the auditory nerve neurophonic (ANN), was differentially recorded with a pair of platinum-iridium ball electrodes placed on either side of the auditory nerve as it exits the internal meatus. The signal recorded from the scalp, termed the frequency following response (FFR), was recorded with silver wire. For purposes of comparison the round window-recorded cochlear microphonic was also examined under identical stimulus conditions. Several measures of the response to acoustic stimulation were taken for each recording configuration. Among these were total response amplitude as a function of stimulus level, spectral component amplitude and phase as a function of stimulus level, fundamental component amplitude as a function of stimulus frequency, response amplitude as a function of time after stimulus onset, response amplitude as a function of forward masker intensity. By all these measures the neurophonic responses are signals that are distinct from the CM and share many of the properties of single units in the auditory nerve. In addition, micro-injections of kainic acid into the cochlear nucleus leave these responses largely unaffected, while tetrodotoxin injections into the cochlea greatly diminish both neurophonic responses, while leaving the CM largely intact. From these results, we conclude that at stimulus levels below 90 dB SPL the ANN is almost entirely neural in origin, while the FFR is certainly largely neural, that is, that both responses are quite distinct from the CM. We also conclude that they represent a spatial summation of neural activity in the auditory nerve, probably arising from the phase-locked response of single units to low frequency stimuli. In addition to demonstrating that the neurophonics are neural responses, we have begun the process of relating their properties to the distributed phase-locked activity in the auditory nerve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6501114     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(84)90033-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  36 in total

1.  Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Sahil Shah; Thomas McColgan; Go Ashida; Paula T Kuokkanen; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Viral D Tejani; Rachel A Scheperle; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Microsecond precision of phase delay in the auditory system of the barn owl.

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Auditory responses in the barn owl's nucleus laminaris to clicks: impulse response and signal analysis of neurophonic potential.

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A new auditory threshold estimation technique for low frequencies: proof of concept.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Nigel P Cooper; John J Guinan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Hair cell and neural contributions to the cochlear summating potential.

Authors:  Andrew K Pappa; Kendall A Hutson; William C Scott; J David Wilson; Kevin E Fox; Maheer M Masood; Christopher K Giardina; Stephen H Pulver; Gilberto D Grana; Charles Askew; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A functional circuit model of interaural time difference processing.

Authors:  Thomas McColgan; Sahil Shah; Christine Köppl; Catherine Carr; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The Compound Action Potential in Subjects Receiving a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  William C Scott; Christopher K Giardina; Andrew K Pappa; Tatyana E Fontenot; Meredith L Anderson; Margaret T Dillon; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Binaural beats and frequency-coding.

Authors:  W Fritze; W Köhler
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1986

10.  On the origin of the extracellular field potential in the nucleus laminaris of the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  Paula T Kuokkanen; Hermann Wagner; Go Ashida; Catherine E Carr; Richard Kempter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.