Literature DB >> 6499355

Verapamil and propranolol in essential hypertension.

A K Halperin, K M Gross, J F Rogers, L X Cubeddu.   

Abstract

Twenty-four subjects with mild to moderate essential hypertension completed this 9-wk parallel, randomized, double-blind study of the antihypertensive effects of verapamil (V) (240 to 480 mg%) and propranolol (P) (120 to 360 mg%). V lowered systolic and diastolic blood pressures in all postural positions, with an average reduction of 20/16 mm Hg. With the exception of standing systolic blood pressure, P also lowered systolic and diastolic blood pressures in all postural positions, with an average reduction of 9/11 mm Hg. Differences between V and P were significant only for sitting systolic blood pressure. Heart rate was decreased by P but was not affected by V. The PR interval was prolonged by V. Plasma levels of V and P were directly related to dose. Plasma levels of V were linearly related to those of its major metabolite, norverapamil (r = 0.81). There was no correlation between clinical response and the dose or plasma level of V or P, but all subjects who received 480 mg% V had an average blood pressure reduction of 20/16 mm Hg and plasma levels of the parent drug above 200 ng/ml. V is an effective antihypertensive for mild to moderate essential hypertension. Constipation, pedal edema, and a maculopapular rash were reported as side effects of V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6499355     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1984.253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between verapamil and propranolol in normal subjects.

Authors:  D L Murdoch; G D Thomson; G G Thompson; G D Murray; M J Brodie; G T McInnes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  The effect of verapamil on cardiovascular and metabolic responses to exercise.

Authors:  H Petri; B G Arends; M A van Baak
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1986

Review 3.  Verapamil. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension.

Authors:  D McTavish; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Comparative efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of verapamil SR vs verapamil IR in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  N T Fuenmayor; B M Faggin; L X Cubeddu
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Pharmacokinetics of verapamil in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  P Anderson; U Bondesson; U de Faire
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Calcium channel antagonists. Part III: Use and comparative efficacy in hypertension and supraventricular arrhythmias. Minor indications.

Authors:  L H Opie
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.727

7.  Verapamil and bendrofluazide in the treatment of hypertension: a controlled study of effectiveness alone and in combination.

Authors:  N Benjamin; R J Phillips; B F Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Long term effects of sustained release verapamil on the renal and systemic haemodynamic parameters in hypertensive patients with mild to severe chronic renal failure.

Authors:  D C Schohn; H A Jahn; M Maareck
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Efficacy of the calcium antagonist isradipine in angina pectoris.

Authors:  J O Parker; M Enjalbert; V Bernstein
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 10.  Management of essential hypertension in the black patient: profiling as the initial approach to treatment.

Authors:  F H Messerli
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.798

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.