Literature DB >> 1283570

Comparative efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of verapamil SR vs verapamil IR in hypertensive patients.

N T Fuenmayor1, B M Faggin, L X Cubeddu.   

Abstract

The antihypertensive effects of the regular immediate release formulation of verapamil (verapamil IR) and the newer sustained release formulation of verapamil (verapamil SR) were compared in Hispanic patients with untreated essential hypertension. Verapamil IR was given in 3 divided doses (80 or 160mg 3 times daily) and verapamil SR was given either as a single daily dose of 240mg or as 240mg every 12 hours. With both formulations there was a significant reduction in systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP); a greater lowering of BP was observed with verapamil 480 mg/day than with 240 mg/day. With verapamil SR 480 mg/day, 91% of patients had reductions in SBP and DBP greater than 20 and 15mm Hg, respectively. In addition, 83% of patients reached normotension. With the lower dose (240mg once daily), 83% of patients had decreases in DBP greater than 10mm Hg and 73% of patients achieved normotension. Comparable effects were achieved with verapamil IR. With verapamil IR there was a more rapid fall in BP which peaked 3 to 4 hours postdose, whereas with verapamil SR a more gradual and sustained BP reduction was observed. Only small changes in heart rate (HR) were observed with verapamil IR and verapamil SR. For verapamil SR, the mean increase in HR was 5 beats/min (to 80 beats/min) and the mean decrease in HR was 13 beats/min (to 62 beats/min). Both verapamil SR and verapamil IR prolonged the PR interval of the ECG. An equal degree of PR prolongation was observed with 240 and 480 mg/day. The incidence of side effects (headache, palpitations, dizziness and flushing) was dose dependent, decreased with continuous treatment and was much higher with verapamil IR than with verapamil SR. Steady-state plasma verapamil concentrations were monitored. Compared with verapamil IR, verapamil SR produced a more gradual rise and a more sustained elevation of plasma verapamil and norverapamil concentrations. Comparable trough verapamil concentrations (Cmin) were observed with verapamil IR (98 micrograms/L) and SR (81 micrograms/L); morning Cmin verapamil concentrations were higher than daytime Cmin values. The normalised area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were 10 to 20% greater for verapamil IR than SR. The 2-fold increase in oral dose produced a 2.2- and 2.4-fold increase in AUC for verapamil IR and SR, respectively, associated with a 20% reduction in metabolism to norverapamil. Fasting increased the rate and extent of absorption of verapamil.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1283570     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199200441-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  17 in total

Review 1.  Kinetics and dynamics of calcium entry antagonists in systemic hypertension.

Authors:  R G McAllister; G L Schloemer; S R Hamann
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1986-02-26       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  The role of calcium channel blockers in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  A K Halperin; L X Cubeddu
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 3.  Racial difference in response to antihypertensive drugs. A focus on verapamil.

Authors:  L X Cubeddu
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of verapamil. II. Simultaneous quantitation of verapamil and its active metabolite, norverapamil.

Authors:  S R Harapat; R E Kates
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1980-03-14

5.  Physiological disposition of verapamil in man.

Authors:  M Schomerus; B Spiegelhalder; B Stieren; M Eichelbaum
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 10.787

6.  Verapamil pharmacodynamics and disposition in young and elderly hypertensive patients. Altered electrocardiographic and hypotensive responses.

Authors:  D R Abernethy; J B Schwartz; E L Todd; R Luchi; E Snow
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Pharmacology and mechanisms of action of calcium-channel blockers.

Authors:  A M Katz
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Pharmacokinetics of verapamil in man.

Authors:  Y Koike; K Shimamura; I Shudo; H Saito
Journal:  Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol       Date:  1979-04

9.  Verapamil and propranolol in essential hypertension.

Authors:  A K Halperin; K M Gross; J F Rogers; L X Cubeddu
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 10.  Use of calcium antagonists for cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors:  B N Singh; K Nademanee
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-01-30       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Novel oral drug formulations. Their potential in modulating adverse effects.

Authors:  A T Florence; P U Jani
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Assessment of the Additional Value of Verapamil to a Moxifloxacin and Linezolid Combination Regimen in a Murine Tuberculosis Model.

Authors:  Elise D Pieterman; Lindsey H M Te Brake; Gerjo J de Knegt; Aart van der Meijden; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar; Hannelore I Bax; Rob E Aarnoutse; Jurriaan E M de Steenwinkel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Verapamil: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R N Brogden; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Epidemiology and management of hypertension in the Hispanic population: a review of the available literature.

Authors:  Nicolas J Guzman
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.571

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.