Literature DB >> 6495030

Pressure changes within the cauda equina following constriction of the dural sac. An in vitro experimental study.

N Schönström, N F Bolender, D M Spengler, T H Hansson.   

Abstract

In order to register pressure changes within the cauda equina, a highly sensitive pressure measuring catheter was inserted through a hole in the dural sac. Its tip was placed among the nerve roots of the cauda equina at levels L2, L3, and L4 in seven freshly removed human specimens. The cross-sectional area of the dural sac then was decreased gradually by constriction of a circular clamp. The inside diameter of the clamp and the corresponding area was determined when further reduction of the circumference of the clamp caused the first signs of a pressure increase, the critical size, among the nerve roots. The average critical size was 76.9 mm2 at the L2 level, corresponding to a diameter of 11.4 mm At the L3 level, the corresponding figures were 71.5 mm2 and 11.1 mm, and at the L4 level 64.8 mm2 and 10.6 mm, respectively. It seemed reasonable to assume that the critical sizes determined in this way could be threshold values below which a further constriction of the size of the dural sac would cause an impairment of the circulatory and/or the nerve function of the cauda equina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6495030     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198409000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in the dural sac cross-sectional area on axial loaded MR imaging: is there a difference between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis?

Authors:  H Ozawa; H Kanno; Y Koizumi; N Morozumi; T Aizawa; T Kusakabe; Y Ishii; E Itoi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  The narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal during loaded MRI: the effects of the disc and ligamentum flavum.

Authors:  Tommy Hansson; Nobuyuki Suzuki; Hanna Hebelka; Arne Gaulitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A novel method for the quantitative evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fengyu Zheng; James C Farmer; Harvinder S Sandhu; Patrick F O'Leary
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-09

4.  Is spinal stenosis assessment dependent on slice orientation? A magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Lucy Henderson; Gerit Kulik; Delphine Richarme; Nicolas Theumann; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Diagnostic value of the nerve root sedimentation sign, a radiological sign using magnetic resonance imaging, for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liangming Zhang; Ruiqiang Chen; Peigen Xie; Wei Zhang; Yang Yang; Limin Rong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Predictive factors of efficacy of periradicular corticosteroid injections for lumbar radiculopathy.

Authors:  C Cyteval; N Fescquet; E Thomas; E Decoux; F Blotman; P Taourel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Stephane Genevay; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.098

8.  Early postoperative MRI in detecting hematoma and dural compression after lumbar spinal decompression: prospective study of asymptomatic patients in comparison to patients requiring surgical revision.

Authors:  Massimo A Leonardi; M Zanetti; N Saupe; K Min
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A case of indirect cauda equina syndrome from metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shilo Lefresne; Alysa Fairchild; Aalo Bistritz; Peter Venner; Don Yee
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Transforaminal epidural steroid injection for lumbosacral radiculopathy: preganglionic versus conventional approach.

Authors:  Joon Woo Lee; Sung Hyun Kim; Ja-Young Choi; Jin-Sup Yeom; Ki-Jeong Kim; Sang-Ki Chung; Hyun-Jib Kim; Choonghyo Kim; Kyu Sung Kwack; Jong Won Kwon; Sung Gyu Moon; Woo Sun Jun; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.