Literature DB >> 6490700

The induction of neochondrogenesis in free intra-articular periosteal autografts under the influence of continuous passive motion. An experimental investigation in the rabbit.

S W O'Driscoll, R B Salter.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the chondrogenic potential of free intra-articular autografts of periosteum under the influence of joint immobilization compared with continuous passive motion. A graft of periosteum (including the cambium layer) was taken from the medial aspect of the proximal end of the tibia and transplanted into each corresponding knee joint in thirty adolescent New Zealand rabbits. A cast was applied to the left hind limb to immobilize the knee joint in a position of 40 degrees of flexion; the animal was then placed on the continuous passive-motion apparatus so that the right knee joint could be moved continuously and passively from 40 to 110 degrees of flexion. Fifteen rabbits were killed at intervals from seven to twenty-eight days and fifteen rabbits were killed at twenty-one days. The grafts in the immobilized limbs were small and soft, and did not resemble cartilage, whereas the grafts in the limbs that had been treated with continuous passive motion had grown much larger and had taken on the gross appearance of articular cartilage. After one week the cells in the cambium layer were rapidly proliferating and by two weeks there was consistent evidence of differentiation along a chondroid line in the grafts that had been exposed to continuous passive motion. After three weeks bone formation was apparent in all of the grafts, which had become adherent to the synovial tissue and vascularized. Cartilage was the predominant tissue in only 8 per cent of the grafts in the immobilized limbs, compared with 59 per cent of the grafts (p less than 0.01) in the limbs exposed to continuous passive motion. This investigation demonstrated the chondrogenic potential of free periosteal grafts in a synovial fluid environment and also the stimulating effect of continuous passive motion on periosteal neochondrogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6490700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  18 in total

1.  Fresh osteochondral allografts for posttraumatic knee defects: long-term followup.

Authors:  A E Gross; W Kim; F Las Heras; D Backstein; O Safir; K P H Pritzker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Isolation of a cDNA sequence of rabbit GDF5 (mature form) and pattern of its mRNA expression during periosteal chondrogenesis.

Authors:  A Sanyal; G Sarkar; J S Fitzsimmons; S W O'Driscoll
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  New and Emerging Techniques in Cartilage Repair: MACI.

Authors:  Brad S Dunkin; Christian Lattermann
Journal:  Oper Tech Sports Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 0.280

4.  Regenerating hyaline cartilage in articular defects of old chickens using implants of embryonal chick chondrocytes embedded in a new natural delivery substance.

Authors:  D Robinson; N Halperin; Z Nevo
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Motion versus fixed distraction of the joint in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Charles L Saltzman; Stephen L Hillis; Mary P Stolley; Donald D Anderson; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Intramedullary nailing of femoral and tibial shaft fractures.

Authors:  George W Wood
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  Transforming growth factor-beta1 modulates insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 expression and proteolysis in cultured periosteal explants.

Authors:  Carlos Gonzalez; Kiem G Auw Yang; Joseph H Schwab; James S Fitzsimmons; Monica M Reinholz; Zachary T Resch; Laurie K Bale; Victoria R Clemens; Cheryl A Conover; Shawn W O'Driscoll; Gregory G Reinholz
Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 2.372

Review 8.  The basic science of continuous passive motion in promoting knee health: a systematic review of studies in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Derrick M Knapik; Joshua D Harris; Garett Pangrazzi; Michael J Griesser; Robert A Siston; Sudha Agarwal; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  No effect of subperiosteal growth factor application on periosteal neo-chondrogenesis in osteoperiosteal bone grafts for osteochondral defect repair.

Authors:  Tobias Gotterbarm; Steffen J Breusch; Simona Berardi Vilei; Pierre Mainil-Varlet; Wiltrud Richter; Martin Jung
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  A review of articular cartilage pathology and the use of glucosamine sulfate.

Authors:  C B James; T L Uhl
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.