Literature DB >> 6487726

Small-sample bias of point estimators of the odds ratio from matched sets.

N P Jewell.   

Abstract

The bias of several point estimators of the odds ratio arising from matched-pair data is investigated for small samples. Simple alternatives to the traditional maximum likelihood estimator are suggested, on both the original scale and the logarithm scale. In each case the suggested estimators possess a superior performance in terms of mean square error. Generalizations are given for 1:R matched data sets.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6487726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  11 in total

1.  Pooled exposure assessment for matched case-control studies.

Authors:  Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; David M Umbach; Clarice R Weinberg
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder subtype differentially predicts smoking expectancies in adolescents.

Authors:  Ida Foster; Simon Racicot; Jennifer J McGrath
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample size.

Authors:  Szilard Nemes; Junmei Miao Jonasson; Anna Genell; Gunnar Steineck
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Reducing Bias and Mean Squared Error Associated With Regression-Based Odds Ratio Estimators.

Authors:  Robert H Lyles; Ying Guo; Sander Greenland
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 1.111

5.  Finding factors influencing risk: comparing Bayesian stochastic search and standard variable selection methods applied to logistic regression models of cases and controls.

Authors:  Michael D Swartz; Robert K Yu; Sanjay Shete
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Raw grated beetroot linked to several outbreaks of sudden-onset gastrointestinal illness, Finland 2010.

Authors:  A Jacks; S Toikkanen; A Pihlajasaari; T Johansson; M Hakkinen; K Hemminki; P Hokkanen; A Käpyaho; A Kärnä; K Valkola; T Niskanen; J Takkinen; M Kuusi; R Rimhanen-Finne
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.434

7.  Case-control matching: effects, misconceptions, and recommendations.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Nicholas Patrick Jewell; Sander Greenland
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 12.434

8.  No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  Maarten van Smeden; Joris A H de Groot; Karel G M Moons; Gary S Collins; Douglas G Altman; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Johannes B Reitsma
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Re-evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of bootstrap-based optimism correction methods in the development of multivariable clinical prediction models.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Iba; Tomohiro Shinozaki; Kazushi Maruo; Hisashi Noma
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic accuracy measures when comparing multiple screening tests - an application to the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study.

Authors:  Emily Day; David Eldred-Evans; A Toby Prevost; Hashim U Ahmed; Francesca Fiorentino
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.