Literature DB >> 22962519

Reducing Bias and Mean Squared Error Associated With Regression-Based Odds Ratio Estimators.

Robert H Lyles1, Ying Guo, Sander Greenland.   

Abstract

Ratio estimators of effect are ordinarily obtained by exponentiating maximum-likelihood estimators (MLEs) of log-linear or logistic regression coefficients. These estimators can display marked positive finite-sample bias, however. We propose a simple correction that removes a substantial portion of the bias due to exponentiation. By combining this correction with bias correction on the log scale, we demonstrate that one achieves complete removal of second-order bias in odds ratio estimators in important special cases. We show how this approach extends to address bias in odds or risk ratio estimators in many common regression settings. We also propose a class of estimators that provide reduced mean bias and squared error, while allowing the investigator to control the risk of underestimating the true ratio parameter. We present simulation studies in which the proposed estimators are shown to exhibit considerable reduction in bias, variance, and mean squared error compared to MLEs. Bootstrapping provides further improvement, including narrower confidence intervals without sacrificing coverage.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22962519      PMCID: PMC3433076          DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2012.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference        ISSN: 0378-3758            Impact factor:   1.111


  5 in total

1.  Small-sample bias and corrections for conditional maximum-likelihood odds-ratio estimators.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression.

Authors:  Georg Heinze; Michael Schemper
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A Fresh Look at the Discriminant Function Approach for Estimating Crude or Adjusted Odds Ratios.

Authors:  Robert H Lyles; Ying Guo; Andrew N Hill
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 8.710

4.  Bias correction in maximum likelihood logistic regression.

Authors:  R L Schaefer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1983 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Small-sample bias of point estimators of the odds ratio from matched sets.

Authors:  N P Jewell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.571

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.