Literature DB >> 6487672

Effects of noncontingent feedback on EMG training, EMG responses, and subjective experience.

J Segreto-Bures, H Kotses.   

Abstract

Various types of noncontingent feedback have been used as control procedures in EMG training; however, their effects on such training have received little attention. Experiment 1 in the present study examined the effects of noncontingent feedback on EMG training, and Experiment 2 assessed the effects of feedback characteristics on EMG responses. In Experiment 1, three noncontingent feedback groups (yoked control, randomly fluctuating tones, and decreasing tones) and one contingent group underwent 20 minutes of training for frontal EMG decreases. Procedures in Experiment 2 were identical to those in Experiment 1 except that subjects were instructed merely to listen to the feedback tones. Results of Experiment 1 indicated that contingent and noncontingent fluctuating feedback groups achieved significantly lower EMG levels than noncontingent decreasing and yoked control groups. In Experiment 2, however, no differences in EMG activity were found among groups. In both experiments, groups did not differ in terms of subjective variables such as frustration, suspiciousness about the tone, or length of time attending to the tone. Results of these two experiments suggest that differences in EMG responses to various types of noncontingent feedback result from interactions between characteristics of the feedback stimulus and instructions to decrease the stimulus.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6487672     DOI: 10.1007/bf00998843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul        ISSN: 0363-3586


  23 in total

1.  Relaxation training and biofeedback in the reduction of frontalis muscle tension.

Authors:  S N Haynes; D Moseley; W T McGowan
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  An instrument for producing deep muscle relaxation by means of analog information feedback.

Authors:  T H Budzynski; J M Stoyva
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1969

3.  Awareness during electromyographic biofeedback: of signal or process?

Authors:  H Staudenmayer; R A Kinsman
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1976-06

4.  A double-blind methodology for biofeedback research.

Authors:  H D Cohen; C Graham; S S Fotopoulos; M R Cook
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Biofeedback training in frontalis muscle relaxation and enhancement of belief in personal control.

Authors:  G S Stern; J L Berrenberg
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1977-06

6.  Experimenter and subject sex effects in the skin conductance response.

Authors:  L E Fisher; H Kotses
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Role of incentives in the training of the frontal EMG relaxation response.

Authors:  J G Carlson; J L Feld
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1978-12

8.  Operant muscular relaxation and peak expiratory flow rate in asthmatic children.

Authors:  H Kotses; K D Glaus; S K Bricel; J E Edwards; P L Crawford
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Effects of alternative control procedures for electromyographic biofeedback relaxation training.

Authors:  J J Kiffer; A J Fridlund; S C Fowler
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1981-06

10.  Experimenter expectancy effects in frontal EMG conditioning.

Authors:  J Segreto-Bures; H Kotses
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  2 in total

1.  Detection of noncontingent feedback in EMG biofeedback.

Authors:  M M Burnette; H E Adams
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1987-12

2.  The role of EMG awareness in EMG biofeedback learning.

Authors:  J Segreto
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1995-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.