Literature DB >> 6486782

Microbial flora of in-use soap products.

M E McBride.   

Abstract

A comparison has been made of the in-use bacterial load of two bar soaps with and without antibacterials and two liquid soaps in five different locations over a 1-week period. Of the 25 samples taken from each soap, 92 to 96% of samples from bar soaps were culture positive as compared to 8% of those from liquid soaps. Bacterial populations ranged from 0 to 3.8 log CFU per sample for bar soaps and from 0 to 2.0 log CFU per sample for liquid soaps. The mean bacterial populations per sample were 1.96 and 2.47 log CFU for the two bar soaps, and 0.08 and 0.12 log CFU for the two liquid soaps. The difference in bacterial population between bar soaps and liquid soaps was statistically significant (P = 0.005). Staphylococcus aureus was isolated on three occasions from bar soaps but not from liquid soaps. S. aureus was isolated twice from the exterior of the plastic dispensers of liquid soap but not from the soap itself. Gram-negative bacteria were cultured only from soaps containing antibacterials. Bacterial populations on bar soaps were not high compared with bacterial populations on hands, and the flora was continually changing without evidence of a carrier state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6486782      PMCID: PMC241514          DOI: 10.1128/aem.48.2.338-341.1984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  7 in total

1.  BACTERIOLOGICAL STUDIES RELATING TO HANDWASHING. 1. THE INABILITY OF SOAP BARS TO TRANSMIT BACTERIA.

Authors:  E A BANNAN; L F JUDGE
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1965-06

2.  Microbial flora of nurses' hands. I. Quantitative differences in bacterial population between nurses and other occupational groups.

Authors:  M E McBride; L F Montes; W J Fahlberg; J M Knox
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  1972 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.736

3.  Serratia marcescens contaminated disinfectants.

Authors:  R D Sheets
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-03-28       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Pseudobacteremia attributed to contamination of povidone-iodine with Pseudomonas cepacia.

Authors:  R L Berkelman; S Lewin; J R Allen; R L Anderson; L D Budnick; S Shapiro; S M Friedman; P Nicholas; R S Holzman; R W Haley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Nosocomial Pseudomonas cepacia infection associated with chlorhexidine contamination.

Authors:  J D Sobel; N Hashman; G Reinherz; D Merzbach
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Prolonged survival of Serratia marcescens in chlorhexidine.

Authors:  T J Marrie; J W Costerton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Nosocomial transmission of Serratia marcescens in a veterinary hospital due to contamination by benzalkonium chloride.

Authors:  J G Fox; C M Beaucage; C A Folta; G W Thornton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Isolation of Raoultella planticola from refillable antimicrobial liquid soap dispensers in a dental setting.

Authors:  Stephanie S Momeni; Nancy Tomlin; John D Ruby
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Washing with contaminated bar soap is unlikely to transfer bacteria.

Authors:  J E Heinze; F Yackovich
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  Evaluation of Environmental Sampling Methods for Detection of Staphylococcus aureus on Fomites.

Authors:  Patrick G Hogan; Carey-Ann D Burnham; Lauren N Singh; Carol E Patrick; J Christian Lukas; Jeffrey W Wang; Victoria J Fraser; Stephanie A Fritz
Journal:  Ann Public Health Res       Date:  2015-01-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.